Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
metacorrector
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
no, what you describe is not an argument against EMH; not defending the poster, I have no idea if the poster understands this, but your critique is faulty and is explained by standard finance theory.
2.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
3.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
4.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
5.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
6.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
When there is an accident, injured parties go after rich people, like the expression "deep pockets", and juries aren't sympathetic to them. Rich people are advised to get (and can afford) insurance more than middle class peop
7.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
i just want to add, you have actually introduced a bug. if your program has any longevity, this misfeature of it will, i predict with confidence, break the program at some point, sooner rather than later, and for no reason other than "
8.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
yuk. this is the sort of issue that should be solved at the level of the OS, not for every app. *nix is pretty much "the" cmdline people refer to, and the unix cmdline was well established and in use at microsoft when microsoft cr
9.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
and when they do apply pressure on Airbus from their side of the cockpit, they can't tell if countervailing pressure is being applied from the other side?
10.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
It wasn't infidelity that was the problem, it was honest emotions.
11.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
Because US citizens need somebody from Google's business model and school of thought fighting for us on the inside and helping the gov't formulate our data and privacy policies?
12.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
that little voice in your head that is screaming "i hate this" is your problem. It really is not a big deal to type a password, and even to type it a few times, just try to have a more zen attitude about it. It's how password
13.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
YCombinator is all tied up with VCs and incubators and such, right? In other contexts such as applying for various types of placements, are people's comment histories reviewed (including whatever amount of doxing is possible via server
14.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
First, to give you the answer, in your position you need to exchange your knight for his, and after he takes back with his queen, attack his queen with your bishop, which seems to offers your bishop as a sacrifice, but it's poison for
15.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
yeah but... the real problem lies elsewhere... VMware (and that style of virtualization) is so popular because of the utter failure of OSes to do what they are supposed to do. Protected multiuser multitasking operating systems are supposed
16.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
the scientific method includes independent confirmation of results, so duplicating others' work is actually learning and understanding the scientific process. publication on the other hand...
17.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
I don't think (as I said) the guy was intending to chase around the world protecting his copyrights, he was trying to show the absurdity of the definitions that copyright law depends on, and in that sense what he did refuted a priori y
18.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
mp4 actually tells you more about a file than mpeg4 does, because mp4 is only one thing, the file. mpeg4 is another thing, but that thing is not a file. So, calling files mpeg4 actually confuses things rather than clarifies them. If you wor
19.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
I just can't sympathize, at all. I would prefer (I realize this is not the law) an internet that was considered public domain. If you don't want you picture copied, don't put it in the public domain. I do understand hard work
20.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
There was a project in the early days of the internet boom, a website was put up (in australia IIRC) with every possible melody combination (using discrete scales) along with a copyright notice for each one, so nobody would be able to write
21.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
my explanation was correct, "common" (but not secret) means that both parties have it (each party also has a secret) and that is the key element to understand what is good about the protocol and what problems it solves. By seeming
22.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
the common color can be public, there is no point in manipulating it. Anybody manipulating it will not be using the common color any more. if you are saying that you plan to trust the MITM to give you the common color, then it's not a
23.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
they are talking about people who would pay money to avoid the very same shocks. So, let's extend your thought, doesn't sound terribly unpleasant? nor does being alone with your thoughts sound terribly unpleasant. But they measure
24.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
We can judge people on life performance, nobody has any problem with that. Why do you want the word for successful life performace to be intelligence? or to put it another way, the article you are responding to is making that point that hig
25.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
the study hinges on whether the researchers who worked on it, designing it and completing many trials over time, writing it up and getting it published, on whether they thought of something that you just thought of? that the unpleasant shoc
26.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
Can't we agree? with redefining what intelligent means on the basis of your reasonably well written discussion post? NO, we can't agree on that at all. Your post is thoughtful and well meaning, but intelligence means... well I
27.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
i don't know exactly how this site works, and i'm not going to research it, but did you actually get downvoted for writing something mildly insightful/humorous?
28.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
Ironically, Burning Man prior to 1996 didn't make me want to shoot guns; now if they allowed me to carry, I don't think I could carry enough.
29.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
how about wikipedia allows multiple style sheets and lets us each choose what we like. One size does not fit all.
30.
▲
by
metacorrector
12y ago
good grief, yes, smart people can be arrogant, yes, smart people can be many other negative things. but my experience walking around the world is that most people are too stupid. Too stupid means, for instance, that they could never begin t
More ›