Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
menschmanfred
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
Mh weird that they bundle it with storage. Makes downgrading hard if you don't track your usage and get used to it
2.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
You believe so and criticize it. To do what? If nothing happens it wasn't worth it to point it it. So apparently you care enough about this topic to complain were is your solutions than to add something useful to it?
3.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
Sooo your solution is to just do nothing at all?
4.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
I don't hate poly. I actually don't even care? My wife is plenty. I even take pictures or videos of things I experience and share it with her later because I want her to do the same. And I thought about poly and I discovered that
5.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
Yes. But the article describes years of usage and it just isn't a problem if you start with k8s today
6.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
K8s introduced Auto rotation surprisingly late. Even we run into that issue 5 years ago. But k8s is still very young and the problem is solved for 5-6 years
7.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
Our setup works very very well. And in smaller setups you would have a shared cluster or fully managed like gke etc.
8.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
It's not. The control plane is ha and you can upgrade one after the other independent of your workers. With workers you can do that too. That feels much less like a snowflake and more like snow.
9.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
Bitcoin miners want to run as often as possible.in Texas they got paid when they don't run. And this takes away any motivation to solve problems and invest in storage etc. It would make more sense for the energy company itself to do th
10.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
Crypto would first need to catch up with all the features our banking system has like account recovery. Besides that, the banking system is already optimized due to the capitalism behind it. Btw. The crypto bros tell you that this doesn
11.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
And those locations should either attract good use cases like data centers or should be incentive to solve this issue in a way that we can use it. Like building more power lines or converting it into transportable energy like H2. Bitcoin pl
12.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
Those are not self aware and can't think about the implications
13.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
Yes and I like the point in general. But we know in which world we bring humans in. Climate change, rassism, bulling etc.
14.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
And have you ever spend time on thinking about your conclusion?
15.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
That's not a good reason for the new human it's only a good and easy reason for the existing humans. To create their future workers/slaves.
16.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
You could have asked my why I think it is selfish. I believe creating new life is playing 'god'. It's easier to never exist than life life. This has nothing to do what you thought
17.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
It's a selfish thing to do. Nonetheless nothing I condemn. At the end of the day it's harder not to have kids and stop this cycle than not, thanks to evolution.
18.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
I'm not sure on what basis you came to your conclusion but I do not have my issues with OneDrive on Mac and gdrive on Windows for ages.
19.
▲
by
menschmanfred
3y ago
Large? With 20 million? I'm lost on the article. Sounds to me they had someone doing this without any DB experience at all. I would not have written a blog post about an obvious choice of having some cheap nvme based 'warehouse&#x