melezhik

5 ms·

1.
LLM based CI pipeline code generator for DSCI
2 points by melezhik 2h ago|0 comments
2.
You can now use GROQ to generate dsci pipelines and they are not bad at all(dsci.sparrowhub.io)
2 points by melezhik 1d ago|4 comments
3.
by melezhik 4d ago
You may take a look at https://deadsimpleci.sparrowhub.io - quite easy to install and use, ci runner included out of the box
4.
by melezhik 5d ago
https://deadsimpleci.sparrowhub.io/doc/README Link to the documentation site
5.
DSCI goes pre beta testing – need early feedback
5 points by melezhik 5d ago|2 comments
6.
by melezhik 8d ago
Link to dsci - https://deadsimpleci.sparrowhub.io/doc/README
7.
by melezhik 8d ago
Example for Qwen - https://chat.qwen.ai/s/t_95583047-b2f3-4b66-9458-003a8752cbf...
8.
DeepSeek/Qwen are surprisingly well at generating code for DSCI pipelines(chat.deepseek.com)
4 points by melezhik 8d ago|3 comments
9.
by melezhik 8d ago
DSCI is lightweight git server with embedded ci with general programming languages as the first citizen class. Majority of LLM I used generates very accurate dsci pipeline configurations for various programming languages . Well done AI
10.
by melezhik 17d ago
Easy to install , no external ci runners , everything is single binary Easy ci - no YAML complexity - just regular programming languages No devops knowledge is required to operate
11.
by melezhik 20d ago
In the website almost zero information . All the highlights blocks are not clickable. Where pipeline syntax docs? The web site looks nice but has almost no meaning data
12.
by melezhik 20d ago
Imho I don’t think small teams need GitHub . I build dsci - fast and lightweight self hosted git and ci system . It’s very easy to use and very soon will have essential minimum features set. I believe that the importance of big saas in over
13.
by melezhik 26d ago
changed on the website
14.
by melezhik 27d ago
the example is fixed, thanks for spotting that
15.
by melezhik 27d ago
I like the idea, thanks
16.
by melezhik 27d ago
In the systems I am familiar with one has to explicitly describe jobs artifacts via YAML files as dependencies, for the most cases it’s not needed as all I need is to pass files between jobs. I don’t want explicit syntax for that, just sh
17.
by melezhik 27d ago
Ok, maybe I will need to add better wording , but the idea stays the same unlike in many ci systems ( GitHub/gitlab/etc pipeline code is general purpose programming language not YAML ), if you read further jobs/tasks you will
18.
by melezhik 27d ago
Yep - tiny , simple structured YAML on the top ( only to list jobs technically) everything else is general purpose programming languages
19.
by melezhik 27d ago
Oh. It’s just a typo. Why it’s worse ?
20.
CI jobs artifacts should not be difficult(deadsimpleci.sparrowhub.io)
19 points by melezhik 27d ago|15 comments
21.
by melezhik 27d ago
IN DSCI CI artifacts are easy, every job can create a file inside ~/artifacts directory and all subsequent will see it. If any job remove a file for ~/artifacts all the subsequent jobs won't see it. So artifacts works as a pi
22.
by melezhik 29d ago
- long ci builds usually means bad code / architecture . CI should not be very heavy and should not take a lot of time. - jobs do not look like, they are indeed written on gp languages, no magic here - run_task / task_var are just
23.
by melezhik 29d ago
Yep. The same feeling )
24.
by melezhik 1mo ago
What is more complex user experience? Writing pipelines on YAML gets complex indeed CI should not be any different from regular programming
25.
by melezhik 1mo ago
- you don’t need runners on remote machines unless you you have hundreds of jobs and which never happens for small or medium size dev teams - job matrix / parallel jobs are barely needed in commercial development , only in open source
26.
by melezhik 1mo ago
Try dsci / it’s super simple
27.
by melezhik 1mo ago
Whoever downvoted this ^^ my comment I need your reasoning … I don’t know why people hate simplicity ) ( or love complexity )
28.
by melezhik 1mo ago
Ok, with DSCI as monolith application where git and CI are the same server, 32GB RAM VM is more then enough , no need to host runners, no need in k8s cluster, no need in dedicated maintain team, so no extra costs on devops tasks ... Also w
29.
by melezhik 1mo ago
You may consider dsci as its ci is baked in and it uses general programming languages directly as the first class citizens
30.
by melezhik 1mo ago
DSCI - http://deadsimpleci.sparrowhub.io - lightweight ( single binary written on golang ) - ci runner embedded ( podman / docker ) - pipelines are written on general programming languages - no YAML craziness - Perl/Py

More ›