mecsred

6 ms·

1.
by mecsred 1mo ago
AI is trained off a massive corpus of internet exchanges. If you tell people youre going to thoroughly inspect their work or are able to check if theyre right, only people with high confidence will respond. I imagine exchanges where the OP
2.
by mecsred 3mo ago
The person being sentenced was not involved in any way based on this information.
3.
by mecsred 7mo ago
That would honestly be an incredible performance art piece, like a distilled waste of a human life just to prove a point. Then even after all that you could ask the question "Is the art inferior, did it prove the point effectively.&quo
4.
by mecsred 7mo ago
Obviously people know, but theres no impulse to introspect on why or how. Knowing that someone else knows you had a hard braking event taps in to our social brains to provide a much stronger response to the event. When we know people are wa
5.
by mecsred 8mo ago
In the current social climate I would absolutely not trust public media to understand general consensus. Ask specific people you trust or seek out their opinions.
6.
by mecsred 8mo ago
If the 16 performs worse in the power efficiency department, that is not great, but it doesnt make my machine run any worse. Calling it heavy is crazy to me, the thing is tiny. If you think it's heavy you'd have trouble using an i
7.
by mecsred 8mo ago
You mean the framework Ive been running for the past 4 years or so?
8.
by mecsred 9mo ago
why do you have to do what people on this website tell you? Write the fun thing.
9.
by mecsred 10mo ago
How do you plan on defending those rights if you dont vote.
10.
by mecsred 10mo ago
If you read first and write last isnt that the opposite of committing and then reading to see what is comitted?
11.
by mecsred 11mo ago
None of the shadows you can physically see in the photos have 0 area because the construction of the fractal isn't perfect. What a perfect construction would look like and if it's ever theoretically possible to make physical are c
12.
by mecsred 11mo ago
It only worked on undirected graphs in 2023. This article is about the newest breakthrough that works on directed graphs as well.
13.
by mecsred 1y ago
Belief is not binary and can change with new evidence. You may believe it is likely someone is innocent, but should still witness all the evidence to update your beliefs. In the rare case that there is concrete and infallible evidence that
14.
by mecsred 1y ago
Considering they provided multiple references to exactly what they were talking about, what gave you issues? They're not talking about what you linked, and they are talking about what they linked.
15.
by mecsred 1y ago
If you read the whole thread, the first comment I replied to, that user said exactly that thing.
16.
by mecsred 1y ago
No, an unnecessary hyperbole would be saying people should be outraged at any app that allows unverified communication.
17.
by mecsred 1y ago
So all forms of communication then? What is the end goal here, present your driver's licence and submit your comment to a Truth Verification Panel to be approved for distribution?
18.
by mecsred 1y ago
Its all anecdotal all the way down, so here's another grain of salt to add to the pile. (Calories in - calories out) is correct enough to be the single most reliable metric, and will serve you right 99% of the time. My "one level
19.
by mecsred 1y ago
Not likely without other contributing technologies. These devices just move heat from one side to the other, at the cost of producing more heat. So you still have to dissipate even more heat on the hot end with a fan/heatsink, in addit
20.
by mecsred 1y ago
I like this litmus test generally, but I think it applies mostly to self aggrandizing behaviour. "Most people are dumber than a threshold I consider intelligent" kind of vibe. I do think humans are stupid though, as in all of us,
21.
by mecsred 1y ago
Thank you Spock.
22.
by mecsred 1y ago
I really don't think learning to rely on these tools for product review is a good idea. The web shows how much gravity the advertising industry has. As soon as the number of people using llms like this become statistically significant,
23.
by mecsred 1y ago
Everyone is an ideologue. What _is_ is too complicated to fit in a human brain, so we compress it. Thinking you're a free thinker is a type of ideology you can subscribe to.
24.
by mecsred 1y ago
Right, my complaint is that it only works like jargon, where you are just giving something a context-specific nickname. As a word shortening scheme, it's terrible. A world where many projects have names like s11g is a nightmare.
25.
by mecsred 1y ago
_#_ has to be one of the worst word shortening schemes I've ever seen get widespread. It only works with a very small number of long-lived technologies, in which case they basically just get a nickname, "k8s" "i18n"
26.
by mecsred 1y ago
Nice work! I like that you put lots of examples in the readme for people to get an idea of the engine right away. It looks great and I hope you enjoyed building it!
27.
by mecsred 2y ago
Thanks for the link to the Rodrigues form, that's quite interesting. Slightly confused by your comment though, shouldn't the matrix logarithm produce another matrix?
28.
by mecsred 2y ago
I think there's a lot more information in this one. Before I decide if I want to click or not, I know it's about Yann Lecun and LLMs at least. Where as Please Stop Talking About AGI could get me anything from Roko's Basilisk
29.
by mecsred 2y ago
I think the way it was handled is pretty reasonable considering it's a public facing statement. Putting your name down on an authoritative statement is an important commitment internally , but a name put down for any reason on a publi
30.
by mecsred 2y ago
Again, I'm not making any comment on the deficit. Literally never brought it up. I'm talking about people losing confidence in the dollar.

More ›