md-

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by md- 1mo ago

   i do agree with that point of view. I often referred to models as 'modern mp3s' storing a lossfull but lookalike version of information in order to counter that 'AI is totally new and not violating copyright by storing inform
2. 2.▲
   by md- 7mo ago

   as you have stated 'And yes, this project was built almost entirely with Claude Code with a bunch of manual verification and testing.' this code is not copyright protected, therefore you are not allowed to apply a MIT LICENSE to t
3. 3.▲
   by md- 5y ago

   .. just a quick reminder for anyone outside of dictatorships: there is independent media/press in germany, the article was not produced by any government entity.
4. 4.▲
   by md- 6y ago

   german here: Tutanota is a german email provider which encrypts incoming email after those were received. The court ordered tutanota to provide incoming emails to a single email account to law enforcement. This is "lawful interception&
5. 5.▲
   by md- 6y ago

   a software vulnerability itself is information about a vulnerability. Information itself is not copyrighted, nobody can own it. A researcher however can own code he/her wrote, e.g. exploit code
6. 6.▲
   by md- 9y ago

   the whole thing is basically a webmail service, but the client provides crypto-functions to encrypt and decrypt messages locally using a smart card reader. The client software has an API which is provided as a webservice on localhost:9998 (