mcfry

4 ms·

1.
by mcfry 8d ago
Great comment! I've been trying to understand it more and was hoping to find more people discussing the result, or the implications of the result, and this was the missing piece for me after watching a few videos.
2.
by mcfry 1mo ago
This is cool, but I feel like the information needs to be refined by someone who understands the domain. A long-form educational resource certainly requires many decisions to be made - where to add more/less detail, where to refine, wh
3.
by mcfry 4mo ago
It's still using a fork of vscode and literally everyone is aware that these other IDEs are forked.
4.
by mcfry 5mo ago
How hard is it to have a video player with a fucking volume toggle?
5.
by mcfry 11mo ago
But it can't actually deduce, can it? If 136891438 * 1294538 isn't in the training data, it won't be able to give you a valid answer using the model itself. There's no process. It has to offload that task to a tool, whic
6.
by mcfry 11mo ago
A proof assistant is a verifier, and a tool so therefor a patch, so I really fail to see how that could be understood as the LLM having deduction.
7.
by mcfry 11mo ago
Something which I haven't been able to fully parse that perhaps someone has better insight into: aren't transformers inherently only capable of inductive reasoning? In order to actually progress to AGI, which is being promised at
8.
by mcfry 11mo ago
This is just... rebranding for instructions and files? lol. Love how instructions for creating a skill is buried. Marketing go brr.
9.
by mcfry 1y ago
You still have the 'pointy' problem, even with many layers, no? The bottom-most block has to be a triangle.
10.
by mcfry 1y ago
Was thinking the same thing. It's impossible to take this article's criticisms of AI seriously when it's so obviously over-edited with AI itself.