mccracken

7 ms·

1.
by mccracken 11y ago
Doesn't mean HN has to be serious 100% of the time.
2.
by mccracken 11y ago
Well it was my favourite movie as a kid, so it was just a knee-jerk reaction
3.
by mccracken 11y ago
Doc
4.
by mccracken 11y ago
I'm a grad getting in to webdev, and I find this fascinating - is it really that bad? Every company I've interviewed at so far has been lenient as long as you know how to solve a problem in a somewhat relevant lang/tech.
5.
Ask HN: What is your workflow?
3 points by mccracken 11y ago|0 comments
6.
by mccracken 11y ago
same reason gun control is a good idea?
7.
by mccracken 11y ago
weird, worked with 0 lag on Ubuntu/Chrome
8.
by mccracken 11y ago
Unfortunately a band-aid solution for a deep-rooted problem (not saying that one shouldn't do it).
9.
by mccracken 11y ago
I even did it on this thread, then realised the irony immediately
10.
by mccracken 11y ago
Snail mail prints to my friends. I'm joking of course, but what a horrible future - imagine if a 1984-like government used this tech to completely censor anything deemed against the "Party"?
11.
by mccracken 11y ago
Film cameras to the rescue. DRM that, buddy!
12.
by mccracken 11y ago
If you go just far enough back, the hours we work would sound ridiculous (but I do agree about the effort).
13.
by mccracken 11y ago
Absolute champion
14.
by mccracken 11y ago
I get: youtube-dl: error: no such option: --youtube-skip-dash-manifest As an error, am I missing something?
15.
by mccracken 11y ago
Pragmatic!
16.
by mccracken 11y ago
I'm interested, how did you figure out that's what was happening (just the first example)?
17.
by mccracken 11y ago
What you say is true - although I'm not sure it matters. There are heaps of art forms which are out of copyright, why should people critique/parody new films? Because they're relevant and people understand the content
18.
by mccracken 11y ago
fair use - education
19.
by mccracken 11y ago
Uncaught TypeError: Failed to construct 'ImageData': Illegal constructor does not work