Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
maxltv
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
maxltv
4y ago
You can turn it off for specific sites (via Grammarly settings) OR you can turn it on only for specific sites (via browser settings). The process is different depending on whether you are using a browser extension or desktop integration. He
2.
▲
by
maxltv
5y ago
I do not think just tweeting at Youtube out of nowhere will work or is even appropriate (it would spam the feeds of a massive number of people). If you have a Twitter conversation with Youtube, I can probably have Grammarly chime in with a
3.
▲
by
maxltv
5y ago
Universities license Grammarly primarily for their students, but instructors also can use it as an aid to educate students about the importance of citing sources. The plagiarism checker is a feature of the main product and cannot be license
4.
▲
by
maxltv
5y ago
What tweet do you need Grammarly to respond to with the confirmation?
5.
▲
by
maxltv
5y ago
It's not forbidden, but it will not work for this purpose as well as a purpose-built enforcement tool. For example, if two students submit the same paper, Grammarly will not flag it, also by design. Faculty still benefits a lot from th
6.
▲
by
maxltv
5y ago
Yes, please feel free to mention that to Youtube. If it helps, I can get the company (Grammarly) to officially confirm that the videos are not a problem if Youtube needs a confirmation. But I am absolutely certain this is by design, and tha
7.
▲
by
maxltv
5y ago
Oleksandre, you got an official response that this is by design. I explained why. This is a landing page, not a separate product, and the description of the plagiarism feature clearly states it's not for policing: "...Our free pla
8.
▲
by
maxltv
5y ago
There is no separate product - it is a feature of the main product. Please point out where documentation says it's for enforcement because that will need to be corrected. It can help teachers educate students about plagiarism but it&#x
9.
▲
by
maxltv
5y ago
A Grammarly team member but posting own thoughts to clarify some things. First, Grammarly has nothing to do with this suspension and does not have any problem with the videos in question, just as mentioned in the official HackerOne response
10.
▲
by
maxltv
5y ago
That would be irrelevant in this case. Grammarly has no issues with the videos, as the company stated in the official responses on HackerOne. Grammarly's plagiarism self-check is to help its users avoid accidental or unintentional plag
11.
▲
by
maxltv
5y ago
More honest in what way?
12.
▲
by
maxltv
5y ago
First, Grammarly has nothing to do with this suspension or any problem with the videos in question. Second, this is not a flaw or a hack but an unsuccessful attempt to use Grammarly for an UNINTENDED purpose. Grammarly is not meant for anti
13.
▲
by
maxltv
5y ago
Grammarly is not paying for this. Grammarly is not involved or even concerned in any way. This is not even a "hack" but rather trying to use Grammarly for something it was not designed for, and showing it does not work for that. &