max46

5 ms·

1.
by max46 5y ago
the answer is simple... either it's an employee for the marketing department who can turn anything into a positive or it's a fanboy. The page long responses that starts with textbook marketing BS ("No worries, the most impor
2.
by max46 5y ago
>If there was a problem with the vaccine we probably would have noticed something by the time a billion people got injected with it. Not when everyone who tries to talk about their bad experiences gets treated like qanon and the morons w
3.
by max46 5y ago
it's a very different situation. The money the artist stole never belonged to him, it wasn't his salary or a budget he was allowed to spend on the fabrication of the art. He had a specific contract and he was paid to take that 84k
4.
by max46 5y ago
every time your eyes look outside your monitor (even for a fraction of a second), they get a little rest. EG.:Looking a your coffee mug before you grab it, looking at the window, adjusting your keyboard, looking at your colleagues, your 2nd
5.
by max46 5y ago
I don't think the stocks liquidations at the beginning of the pandemic is a good example of this. shit was hitting the fan and cities were closing down before most of the "insider trading" happened. If the information they us
6.
by max46 5y ago
this type of solution sounds good until you get hit by a false positive in a game. happened to me on pugb and the only way I could get my account back was with a paypal charge back. It's very typical that game companies refuse to tell
7.
by max46 5y ago
>Win 8: bad >Win 9... well, #8 was so bad they had to skip a number If you know what to install to replace the stupid touchscreen interface with a proper start menu (eg. Stardock Start8) and disable metro ui feature, it's a great
8.
by max46 5y ago
>Teams is another one I don't even want to get started on. At least this one is actively used by most companies (at least outside of IT/devs firms) and they generally find it acceptable. OneDrive on the other hand... Even when
9.
by max46 5y ago
The part that you are missing is that all of alternatives to YouTube pay creators little or no ad money and have far worse search engine/discoverability. If a creator is getting demonetized on youtube, moving to a platform with no mone
10.
by max46 5y ago
>You can, but it will then be obvious to anyone familiar with the references The whole point of "fact checkers" is to be used by people who are not expert on the subject
11.
by max46 5y ago
I think I big mistake people make here is that they think they are far better at everything on a computer than a non-programmer. They don't realize how much you can do in Excel and how much they suck at it. If you can't use it wit
12.
by max46 5y ago
I think I big mistake people make here is that they think they are far better at everything on a computer than a non-programmer. They don't realize how much you can do in Excel and how much they suck at it. If you can't use it wit
13.
by max46 5y ago
It's called Youtube Premium and the vast majority of people of the internet made it very clear they will never pay for it even if the ads are driving them crazy. Youtubers also get far more money from premium views than normal views. I
14.
by max46 5y ago
>You're right - in fact we should do this for every line of code, so that we know of whom to ask questions! if you want to live in this kind of absolutism, I would rather have the name on every line than no comments at all.
15.
by max46 5y ago
>I think it means that the site is an attempt to centralize something that is currently decentralized with that definition, almost half the internet would be "GitHub for...". at some point, you have to realize that it's ju