mauritzio

5 ms·

1.
by mauritzio 5y ago
Well at least one can talk together about stuff and then see if the other suffered and dislikes certain parts or maybe finds it great and exactly why. Then you know quite fast how many experience he/she has in the field.
2.
by mauritzio 5y ago
In the end there is just paint/words. The question how to find and apply the right/wanted paint/words involves many aspects. By training one aspect it doesn't improve the other, but it may or may not improve the overall
3.
by mauritzio 5y ago
Imho he did not be became better at "painting" but he made better designs for paintings . He trained one important aspect of the whole piece of art, the design. The aspect of applying paint was not trained, so that probably has n
4.
by mauritzio 5y ago
The question is does the person performing the job him/herself finds it usefull what he/she does. Is doesn't matter if it is useful in your eyes. Because it has to do with appreciation, selfconfidence identification, findin
5.
by mauritzio 5y ago
Maybe boring things don't attract so many bad programmers, that statistics are getting messed up.
6.
by mauritzio 6y ago
Nice but the most interesting is left out imho. It stops at the human retinas. But the way color then triggers perception would, I assume, also have a very high influence. For example we relate warm and cooler colors to turning forms rela
7.
by mauritzio 6y ago
Well the fact that the companies own the stuff that was researched with tax payer money, which then tax payer money must buy again also doesn't help to scale. As there is no real market but just an oligopol of producers. If the formul
8.
by mauritzio 6y ago
As it is also a bit narrow minded to assume 'nobody' will ever see it will be true for ever... At least now, thanks to modern technology , more can see the art then ever before :-)
9.
by mauritzio 6y ago
The conclusions are a bit too simplistic. A museum is not just an amusement park. If you want to see less art be more selective in what to see or go to the advertised shows and be amused. A museum preserves cultural heritage. The roman book
10.
by mauritzio 6y ago
Such a pretty decoration. Why fast food chains do not look that nice nowadays? It is said we are so developed and wealthy and still we just build and live around ugly stuff all the time ... mmm something changed
11.
by mauritzio 6y ago
Salary is higher in areas where the source of money creation is. The current source by our economic design is currently in the banking credit area. Then the business type, telling the story that appears to be the most interesting for these
12.
by mauritzio 6y ago
Not too crazy to accomplish... mmm maybe a typical scientist attitude imho. Professionals who draw even just static portraits will likely tell you otherwise. With that stuff they will look like botox robot zombies for years :-D ...we wil
13.
by mauritzio 6y ago
Ok eye and neck movement look nice, now they just need to simulate many facial muscles with micromovements that define mimic......
14.
by mauritzio 6y ago
Eyeopening. When "follow your Dreams" leads to this....well did you really dreamed about it that way? Where is the fun? Looks like one becomes a "business" brainwashed robot spending way to much lifetime at doing ??????
15.
by mauritzio 6y ago
A prerequisite of drawing is knowing the thing you draw p.e. the human anatomy and knowing the perception tricks your brain does with the visual input and being able to master the physical use of a drawing tool in its variety. Then you comp
16.
by mauritzio 6y ago
Too symmetric features in most cases to be true...imho
17.
by mauritzio 6y ago
Kubernetes is a software varnish how a puppet master thinks how puppets should behave. Thing is, the puppets turn out to be almost humans and are a big heap of undeterministic behavior. But hey it is all in a sandbox so you can try and try
18.
by mauritzio 6y ago
I would recommend looking and producing Art . Software-perls or paintings, poems whatever you like and admire. The more artist you are the more you suffer from applied art, it is not your fault :-)
19.
by mauritzio 6y ago
Don't think so then there is no real inflation: the total assets equals automatically the amount of money month after month after month.. Better then the never ending growing amount of inflation paper we have noadays.
20.
by mauritzio 6y ago
What if we would give every person a fix amount of money every week during lifetime. Where money older then a year becomes worthless? No inherithing, no accumulation, no positive interest. Because every person is worth the same and all we
21.
by mauritzio 6y ago
People are by nature curious and eager to build. But we also love stories that are too good to be true. We gave the lazy guys, good story tellers, all the power, and thereby the power how money flows and works. Money is such a story: There
22.
by mauritzio 9y ago
..eh yes producing mindless importing stuff, generating code, tracking garbadge burocratic stuff went up. Just importing energy consuming crap. Not personal 'productivity' imho but 'work simulation' by click, giving &#x2
23.
by mauritzio 9y ago
Maybe go to where hardcore stuff is done? Compilers or Spaceships satellites airplanes? I've no idea... :/ Tell me if you find one. I just stopped it and started drawing again at least anyone can 'see' it. Well modern a
24.
by mauritzio 9y ago
Sounds for me like productivity went down...
25.
by mauritzio 9y ago
That is all nice and helps as long as you don't reverse the reasoning like: Oh you can't view/feel depressed, well then just work on it more. For many the gap is just to big... no matter how much effort they put in it.
26.
by mauritzio 9y ago
Crystal clear blindness indeed.
27.
by mauritzio 9y ago
Maybe the biggest failure is to call it 'intelligence'. It seams just a ball trained to fall in a certain sink. Maybe call it artificial selection? Experiences with 'selection' in human history didn't had the nicest
28.
by mauritzio 9y ago
Sorry but mental health issues like depression are related to chemical dysfunctions. Would you say when your eyes become bad just try harder and work on yourself, I suppose you probably just buy glasses. Just because you found something out
29.
by mauritzio 9y ago
Maybe it would be better to "archive" on good paper (encoded) Can not imagine a 1000 year old magnetic device... ;)
30.
by mauritzio 9y ago
I feel you are right. Tim is a romantic typewriter given the time he is living in and Vermeer a conceptual poet :o)

More ›