mattscyoc

6 ms·

1.
by mattscyoc 5y ago
"without any knowledge on the topic" refers to the time BEFORE the user uses the tool. During and after the tool the user will certainly have knowledge after reading and curating the questions and answers, right? Just like, before
2.
by mattscyoc 5y ago
I think it's possible to separate virtues from this. It's a research tool, ultimately. All the sources/sites are cited and links given. That is encouraged, of course. The user is ultimately in control of the tool to change, a
3.
by mattscyoc 5y ago
Would you mind expanding on "intellectual liability" a bit more?
4.
by mattscyoc 5y ago
Absolutely. The link contains research, screenshots, etc. to show how the final content looks, how it is performing, etc. Feel free to take a look. If you create a webpage that has 10s or 100s of different answers to questions for a topic,
5.
by mattscyoc 5y ago
Do you think GPT3 is spam? Where does it get its information? Are Google quick answers spam? While all A.I. be considered spam? Interesting questions. The way that I see the value is that it assists the user with research by pulling togethe
6.
by mattscyoc 5y ago
I think it depends on your own definition. I think spam is highly subjective, no?
7.
by mattscyoc 5y ago
Do you think there is a world where a human does a search and machines extract answers and teach us about a topic, taking answers from across the web?
8.
by mattscyoc 5y ago
Hey, I'm the author of this post on Indie Hackers. I added some data and evidence at the bottom of that post. The content and site is performing really well. I'm curious, why do you think this is spam?
9.
Making $5k/mo from my blog “dogfooding” my own SEO content software(indiehackers.com)
6 points by mattscyoc 5y ago|25 comments