matt3210

5 ms·

1.
by matt3210 3d ago
How does anthropic know what they were doing?
2.
by matt3210 3d ago
Net neutrality anyone? If AI is critical to getting work done in the modern era, its access should be guaranteed. Anyone banned from accessing frontier AI is being forcibly left behind. This includes distillation.
3.
by matt3210 3d ago
Distillation is fair use
4.
by matt3210 3d ago
I bet we'll find that its openAI agent benchmarks off on their own again
5.
by matt3210 4d ago
Just hold the people who make mistakes with AI accountable to those mistakes and the market will naturally slow as people become cautious.
6.
by matt3210 4d ago
The big boys in AI want a moat now that they have the market
7.
by matt3210 4d ago
These'll be part of the training set eventually.
8.
by matt3210 5d ago
If you define what you want in typescript by updating existing typescript wordage, you get what you want exactly as specified, with minimal token cost and no ip theft.
9.
by matt3210 5d ago
If they weren't doing something wrong, they'd answer with a firm "no we're not doing anything wrong" but they only give non-answers.
10.
by matt3210 8d ago
I'm concerned that a huge portion people in my industry actively push for a future which I have no value to society (fully replaced by AI), and my family will suffer greatly by it.
11.
by matt3210 8d ago
Distillation is fair use
12.
by matt3210 8d ago
> ask challenging questions As far as I can tell, it's still not possible for an agent to reliably determine if a question is a good question. That means the test part of the loop cant be fulfilled.
13.
by matt3210 8d ago
Hunting an animal would be considered ok by most, but scaling it to the point of damage is not ok according to most.
14.
by matt3210 8d ago
Look at openAIs history, they clearly have no idea what the agents are doing.
15.
by matt3210 8d ago
> "While unlikely, we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models " Ah yes, taking code from a person/company is fine if its deidentified!
16.
by matt3210 8d ago
Agreeing to partially credit is an admission that they used his work.
17.
by matt3210 8d ago
When do operators become responsible for what their agents do? "The AI did it" should not be a valid defense. An Agent action should be treated as the actions of the person or company who pays for the inference.
18.
by matt3210 8d ago
OpenAI doesn't even know what agents are doing during benchmarks. They're constantly hacking or communicating. They probably just can't answer the question on if user data was used.
19.
by matt3210 8d ago
Anything other then "we did not access your data or train on your data" is a MASSIVE RED FLAG.
20.
by matt3210 1mo ago
Is this higher than the general public?
21.
by matt3210 3mo ago
We should stop pretending this was anything other than institutional power being used to suppress a competitor to xAI
22.
by matt3210 3mo ago
What a coincidence, Anthropic getting handicapped so xAI can try to catch up
23.
by matt3210 3mo ago
I guess current AI, IS the best it will ever be
24.
by matt3210 3mo ago
They have stock in nvidia
25.
by matt3210 4mo ago
Why not playwright and google ai mode or ai search header?
26.
by matt3210 4mo ago
AI mistakes are due to pure laziness and incompetence that appears well done. There’s a big difference between that and a genuine mistake from a knowledgeable person.
27.
by matt3210 4mo ago
When people realize the AI doesn’t work in the long run we can have a mass revert party
28.
by matt3210 4mo ago
Now update the ad blocker to hide them automatically
29.
by matt3210 4mo ago
Ai is free now, how cool. Now we make an agent that uses google search ai in playwright.
30.
by matt3210 4mo ago
Tokens aren’t that much of an issue when your not evaluated on the usage

More ›