Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mathias
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
mathias
4y ago
Did you know that “old” Chrome Headless (2017–2023) was a separate, alternate browser implementation that just happened to be shipped as part of the same Chrome binary? It doesn’t share any of the Chrome browser code in //chrome.
2.
▲
Chrome’s Headless mode gets an upgrade: introducing –headless=new
(developer.chrome.com)
5 points
by
mathias
4y ago
|
2 comments
3.
▲
by
mathias
6y ago
https://github.com/puppeteer/recorder
4.
▲
Faster Apps with JSON.parse (Chrome Dev Summit 2019)
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
mathias
7y ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
by
mathias
7y ago
The article includes a working polyfill that includes old IE support.
6.
▲
by
mathias
7y ago
Author of the referenced article here. The article includes a working polyfill that includes old IE support, so I’m not sure what you’re complaining about. Also, saying “jsvu is the justification for the polyfill” doesn’t make much sense. j
7.
▲
What’s new in JavaScript (Google I/O ’19)
(youtube.com)
8 points
by
mathias
7y ago
|
0 comments
8.
▲
by
mathias
7y ago
Thanks :) Glad to see people appreciate simplicity (and the performance that comes with it).
9.
▲
by
mathias
8y ago
We do indeed measure improvements against more than one website. We wouldn’t want to improve website X while regressing the rest of the internet. See https://v8.dev/blog/real-world-performance (from 2016): > We now
10.
▲
by
mathias
8y ago
The article links to the explanation by the proposal champions: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/blob/master/PR...
11.
▲
by
mathias
8y ago
I mean, they have been solved. With the exception of String#matchAll (which is currently a Stage 3 proposal), all these features are part of ES2018 and shipping in Chrome. Other browsers implement some of them already and are working on s
12.
▲
by
mathias
8y ago
I make sure to keep the article up-to-date. It correctly states the status for each of the features. They’re all part of ES2018 with the exception of String#matchAll which is currently at Stage 3.
13.
▲
by
mathias
8y ago
Hey, I’m the author of the article. Despite its age, it’s still accurate and up-to-date. > these features aren't entirely new Depends on what you mean by that. These features are still not universally supported by all modern browser
14.
▲
by
mathias
8y ago
That’s not very JavaScript-y. Where else in ECMAScript are constants used like this?
15.
▲
by
mathias
8y ago
That would be a Chromium feature. V8 only implements ECMAScript and WebAssembly.
16.
▲
JavaScript engine fundamentals: optimizing prototypes
(mathiasbynens.be)
2 points
by
mathias
8y ago
|
0 comments
17.
▲
What’s new in modern JavaScript and V8? (Google I/O ’18)
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
mathias
8y ago
|
0 comments
18.
▲
by
mathias
9y ago
The article is two years old but still up-to-date. The links to the relevant browser bugs are in the document, and the Edge bug is still unresolved. https://wpdev.uservoice.com/forums/257854-microsoft-edge-dev...
19.
▲
by
mathias
9y ago
> In older browsers, useCapture is NOT an optional parameter Which browsers are those?
20.
▲
by
mathias
9y ago
> Which means you can’t practically use the new form without feature detection. That does not follow. `{ capture: true }` works in both, since it’s an object, and thus truthy. There’s no need for feature detection in the case you describ
21.
▲
by
mathias
9y ago
That’s not equivalent though — in the article’s example, imagine `element` is `undefined`, for example. `then()` wouldn’t be called in that case.
22.
▲
by
mathias
9y ago
Correct. By Stage 3, the proposal is supposed to be stable enough to start shipping it in stable browsers.
23.
▲
Asynchronous stack traces: why await beats .then()
(mathiasbynens.be)
2 points
by
mathias
9y ago
|
0 comments
24.
▲
by
mathias
9y ago
Wondering what a given legacy HTML color value (as seen in `bgcolor`, `text`, `link`, `vlink`, and `alink` attribute values) looks like? This tool (which I made for a presentation years ago) shows you: https://mothereff.in/b
25.
▲
Browser-based timing attacks: demos
(labs.tom.vg)
9 points
by
mathias
10y ago
|
1 comments
26.
▲
Unicode property escapes `\p{…}` and `\P{…}` in JavaScript regular expressions
(mathiasbynens.be)
1 points
by
mathias
10y ago
|
0 comments
27.
▲
by
mathias
10y ago
Present tense: https://domenic.github.io/streams-demo/
28.
▲
by
mathias
10y ago
Replace `test` with `example.com` et voila.
29.
▲
by
mathias
10y ago
+1. Still, code screenshots in Notepad?!
30.
▲
by
mathias
10y ago
Nowhere in the blog post does Wright say “this is the proof I’m Satoshi”. The entire write-up reads like he’s just giving an example. Why does everyone think it’s some kind of proof?
More ›