mathgradthrow

7 ms·

1.
by mathgradthrow 2mo ago
The word you are looking for, probably, is "totally disconnected". Discrete always refers to the "discrete topology".
2.
by mathgradthrow 2mo ago
Navel gazing is a physical phenomenon, so if you would like to know everything about physical phenomena, you have to be able to predict the navel gazers.
3.
by mathgradthrow 3mo ago
>Homework requires internet-connected devices I see an opportunity for much more reasonable legislation since this is a thing that the gov already controls.
4.
by mathgradthrow 4mo ago
So many of these invariants are redundant and so few of them encode any of the interesting rules of chess.
5.
by mathgradthrow 4mo ago
well, I wrote should as a hedge.
6.
by mathgradthrow 4mo ago
Someone flips a coin and looks at it, what orders are you willing to put in? The potential for insiders should be represented by a complete loss of liquidity.
7.
by mathgradthrow 4mo ago
I think when your work is no longer required, you will probably come to regret this sentiment, not that it matters.
8.
by mathgradthrow 5mo ago
You're right, but I was confusing counterparty risk and adverse selection.
9.
by mathgradthrow 5mo ago
Everytime someone loses money on a bad bet in a prediction market, it's an opportunity for them to learn something about ~~counter-party risk~~ adverse selection. You could easily make the argument that the more people are losing in pr
10.
by mathgradthrow 5mo ago
a realistic response? What's a realistic response to "how many calories are in an avocado?" If you are counting calories, you don't want the answer to "how many calories are in the average avocado?", you want t
11.
by mathgradthrow 5mo ago
Income is by far the dominant term, you're being ridiculous.
12.
by mathgradthrow 5mo ago
You are responding to data about the median American.
13.
by mathgradthrow 5mo ago
Did you not vote?
14.
by mathgradthrow 5mo ago
Does this question need asking?
15.
by mathgradthrow 5mo ago
This is the dumbest thing that has ever been posted on this site.
16.
by mathgradthrow 6mo ago
You don't have to agree to a disparagement clause... She accepted a lot of money to agree to it.
17.
by mathgradthrow 6mo ago
Putin can barely fight his own war, and how are you proposing that China supply Iran? You can't rebuild capability in a day. Do you want to give odds to your proposition that this is going to turn around in the IRGC's favor?
18.
by mathgradthrow 6mo ago
I don't know if any have completed runs yet, but supposedly we're using B-52s...
19.
by mathgradthrow 6mo ago
1) The US has run 13,000 missions over Iran in the last month. Thats a lot of targets. 2) The initial US degradation of Iraqi capabilities was much much greater in gulf war 1. 3) F15s are not stealth fighters. 4) This is 35 years later. 5)
20.
by mathgradthrow 6mo ago
I don't believe you understand how modern bombs work.
21.
by mathgradthrow 6mo ago
You think the pentagon was like "shit, Iran is bigger than we thought"?
22.
by mathgradthrow 6mo ago
I'm not really sure that's any of their business.
23.
by mathgradthrow 6mo ago
wasn't that about when the iphone came out?
24.
by mathgradthrow 6mo ago
> try tweaking the description of a widely-known algorithm just a little bit and see how good the generated code follows the spec. this works well for me
25.
by mathgradthrow 6mo ago
No, because of the fundamental limitation of DRM. Content must be delivered as plaintext.
26.
by mathgradthrow 7mo ago
Equality is defined on sets. Everything is a set. Equality means equalty as sets. That's how math aorks unless you're doing type theory shit.
27.
by mathgradthrow 7mo ago
localization? Why would you oppose LLMs doing localization?
28.
by mathgradthrow 7mo ago
never let philosophers do math
29.
by mathgradthrow 7mo ago
No. Equality is defined on sets, with exactly one exception, this stupid fucking notation.
30.
by mathgradthrow 7mo ago
What do you consider "absolutely true" or "in general" to mean?

More ›