Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mathemadigal
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
mathemadigal
1y ago
I apologize for the ambiguity, it’s apparent when you’ve read the article as it addresses this specific point. Namely, if the sieve is the only generating function for all of the primes then 1 would need to be omitted as prime as removing i
2.
▲
by
mathemadigal
1y ago
I think we’ll need to wait for an answer to if there is a prime number generating function. At that time we can determine if 1 is prime. If it’s found that Eratosthenes’ sieve is the only prime generating function then we have our answer.