masomenos

8 ms·

1.
by masomenos 12y ago
you can get the same effect with whatever is a plus lens for you, though. So if your normal rx is -1.5, do close work without glasses.
2.
by masomenos 12y ago
With plus lens therapy, you only wear the plus lens while doing close work. If you were wearing the plus lenses while looking more than a few feet away, you wouldn't be doing plus lens therapy.
3.
by masomenos 12y ago
DHH said there are things about the "large tent" aspect of rails that are annoying. That's not the same thing as being unhappy with the overall direction of the project.
4.
by masomenos 12y ago
Are you implying that there wasn't controversy over the Big Dig? I remember plenty.
5.
by masomenos 12y ago
The second doesn't follow from the first. At most, you could say that people MAY calculate that running a tor relay is no longer worth it, but you could also say that without bringing up the (almost completely unrelated) daycare exampl
6.
by masomenos 13y ago
If only that were true! My first employer was a large organization that explicitly embraced the waterfall methodology that we all rightfully deride.
7.
by masomenos 13y ago
Tried Etymotic earbuds? They come with a bunch of adapters to fit different sized ears. My model is of course discontinued but the mc5 looks closest. http://www.etymotic.com/ephp/mc5.html edit: unlike any other earbuds
8.
by masomenos 13y ago
Took me a couple months to reliably understand my first landlord in Boston, a 3rd or 4th generation American of Italian ancestry.
9.
by masomenos 13y ago
Unless there are multiple secured domains hosted on that IP address, in which case knowing the domain would be extra information.
10.
by masomenos 13y ago
Even if your UI is all in JS, Rails still saves a ton of work as an API server compared to Sinatra.
11.
by masomenos 13y ago
Training should only cause physical agony if: 1) you have a serious, unaddressed medical condition (please seek help!) 2) you're trying something far beyond your normal activity level. There's no rush, work up gradually and your body will a
12.
by masomenos 13y ago
2-3 hours a day x 5 days a week -- 10-15 hrs -- is a huge amount of time to spend on weights. A Starting Strength routine shouldn't take more than 3-4 hours a week, and you'd be moving way more than your bodyweight. Or, if you can find room
13.
by masomenos 13y ago
This is the line of reasoning Taleb criticizes. I haven't digested his criticism fully enough to fairly summarize it, but I think it's worth a look.
14.
by masomenos 13y ago
If you liked Millionaire next door, let me recommend Nassim Nicholas Taleb's "Fooled by Randomness" for counterpoint.
15.
by masomenos 13y ago
I've found, from painful experience, that most physical therapists aren't particularly oriented towards strength training. If you can find an FMS certified strength trainer, there's a good chance they could help diagnose your situation. ht
16.
by masomenos 15y ago
Thanks for the reminder! This is something I've had at the back of my mind for the 10+ years I've been using vim, so high time.
17.
by masomenos 15y ago
thanks! I've been poking around for how to do that for a week, but hadn't stumbled on it.
18.
by masomenos 15y ago
I'm at 3.5+ years on my current white macbook, and finally about ready to get a new one. Use it most of the day, most days for web and misc development. Thinking a macbook pro with SSD & 8GB has a chance of lasting even longer.
19.
by masomenos 16y ago
I did not know that git had a grep command -- super handy.
20.
by masomenos 16y ago
Haven't read the new book, but Taubes' previous work 'Good Calories, Bad Calories' makes a strong case that there's shockingly little experimental evidence in favor of the conventional wisdom that "eating better" means a low fat, low calori
21.
by masomenos 16y ago
Not necessarily. It can also indicate that we don't really understand a phenomenon, which can be a very valuable observation. Certainly better than assuming we know something to be true that later turns out to be unsupported, eg. high fat d
22.
by masomenos 16y ago
Every security professional I've heard speak emphasizes the importance of grasping what they tend to call "the security mindset". Which I understand to mean putting yourself in the place of an attacker and asking how your code could be take
23.
by masomenos 16y ago
The visibility problem is one of the first things they mention in any safety training. You definitely don't belong on a motorcycle if you don't understand that & don't have the skills to deal -- it's not for everyone.
24.
by masomenos 16y ago
While motorcycles are clearly not quite as safe as cars, every study I've seen found that the vast, vast majority of motorcycle accidents involved at least one of the following: - untrained rider - failure to use safety equipment - drunk My
25.
by masomenos 16y ago
Going by the analysis in the post, and in the parent comment, the 20mm would probably be positively correlated with attractiveness because it's easier to get a shallower depth of field with it. However, you're certainly correct that convent
26.
by masomenos 16y ago
Interesting! Did not know that. Any idea how replica sets / shards might fit into this picture?
27.
by masomenos 16y ago
http://www.mongodb.org/display/DOCS/Atomic+Operations says: "MongoDB supports atomic operations on single documents. MongoDB does not support traditional locking and complex transactions for a number of reasons. . ." What made you think
28.
by masomenos 16y ago
1.3.3 was a development version, as is every odd numbered: http://www.mongodb.org/display/DOCS/Version+Numbers
29.
by masomenos 16y ago
I'm sorry if Chicago beat you up and took your lunch money. I've never tried living there, but it's a great place to visit. Great food, great museums, great parks, Great Lake. Blues music. You can get there on a train from many places. Also
30.
by masomenos 16y ago
The Sudbury Valley model is definitely an extreme as far as the freedom & responsibility it invests in its students -- the school decisions you mention include expelling students, whether to rehire each teacher every year, etc.

More ›