marxmarv

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by marxmarv 10y ago

   For most employees, that's not compensation, but speculation.
2. 2.▲
   by marxmarv 10y ago

   By the Big Lie theory, what's the diff?
3. 3.▲
   by marxmarv 10y ago

   b) It justifies their ongoing employment.
4. 4.▲
   by marxmarv 10y ago

   >Much as I agree with transparency, I think we need to recognize that everyone--including political candidates--has some right to private communications. No, they don't, unless you see the need for them to act against our interests
5. 5.▲
   by marxmarv 10y ago

   Imaginary friends don't have legitimate interests.
6. 6.▲
   by marxmarv 10y ago

   The drama of something to argue over with their Establishment sister party, perhaps? It is plain that the Democratic Party doesn't want Sanders voters if they're going to demand Sanders policy outcomes. There's no drama in s
7. 7.▲
   by marxmarv 10y ago

   Sounds like you've made the choice to see it as apathy.
8. 8.▲
   by marxmarv 11y ago

   DARPA don't need no ethics board.
9. 9.▲
   by marxmarv 14y ago

   Presumably, if proprietary code isn't linked with GPL code, it's not a derived work, but two separate works under different licenses. If your situation can tolerate it, you might could write a gplserver running in a separate address space.