Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
markuskobler
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
markuskobler
12y ago
Its just a more aggressive version of name mangling that Uglify also 'suffers'[1] from. The setting does say advanced with good reason. [1] https://github.com/jadejs/jade/issues/298
2.
▲
by
markuskobler
12y ago
This probably won't help but it makes for a great quote when speaking about around this topic.
3.
▲
by
markuskobler
12y ago
Google's ability to indexing content is only part of the story. Google cant link to your content if its not deep link friendly and will rank it poorly if you content loads slowly. Both of which SPA are often bad at delivering. I demoed
4.
▲
by
markuskobler
12y ago
I agree. The first release of IE had a user-agent starting with Mozilla and its something all major browsers (Chrome, Safari, IE, Firefox) still prefix their user-agents with. Mozilla/1.22 (compatible; MSIE 2.0; Windows 3.1) Sti
5.
▲
by
markuskobler
12y ago
So Russ Cox goes into more detail in this post https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-nuts/MdYlJbW4SAo/TrAE... Although Go does not compile via C, occasionally C code does need to refer to Go iden
6.
▲
by
markuskobler
12y ago
I have taken exactly the same stance which has the added benefit you can also drop the vulnerable RC4 cyphers. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS#RC4_weakne...
7.
▲
by
markuskobler
12y ago
Given how big the changes/cuts to OpenSSL so far this seems like a positive step towards making it a future credible alternative. As for the vitriolic LibreSSL rhetoric. I for one hope that both projects continue to improve and thrive
8.
▲
by
markuskobler
13y ago
On modern hardware with many cpu cores you can use a similar process of fork and join to maximise throughput of large datasets.
9.
▲
by
markuskobler
13y ago
+1 to the request headers and HTTPS support
10.
▲
by
markuskobler
13y ago
The redesign looks good. Out of interest why are you not using something like websockets or SSE to push updates to the client?
11.
▲
by
markuskobler
13y ago
Are these trivial micro benchmarks, (simply respond with an empty 200) not totally misleading to focus on? Especially when you start to factor in many real workloads that involve disk or network io.