mariusmarais

8 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mariusmarais 4y ago

   It was also deliberate in the sense that they specifically wanted to make it impossible to link different identities on the same key in order to protect privacy. So you can be user1 and user2@ without the site being able to tell from the au
2. 2.▲
   by mariusmarais 4y ago

   I like how the replies are starting to make the little arrow thing. Reminds me of something...
3. 3.▲
   by mariusmarais 5y ago

   Hope it wasn't P1 for the full 21 years. Edit: Bumped from P3 -> P1 3 months ago :)
4. 4.▲
   by mariusmarais 5y ago

   For now. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1382842277719003136
5. 5.▲
   by mariusmarais 5y ago

   I think a big part of the problem is that probably 12x of those have to re-implement because they want to change something unrelated like styling, or want to add more components, but can't extend existing libs without using the same st
6. 6.▲
   by mariusmarais 6y ago

   For me I get the best result when the receiver is on a USB extension hanging down from the table behind the monitor. Currently it's about 30cm from the floor. Every single on-desk position caused interference and delays. (This is from
7. 7.▲
   by mariusmarais 6y ago

   I was thinking about domains that may have transferred recently. We took over a very "nice" domain last year, but obviously not the historic emails.
8. 8.▲
   by mariusmarais 6y ago

   Seems like someone finally got to Inbox Zero. But terrifying at the same time. I wonder how many valuable targets might have had outstanding validations from 10 years ago, or even 3 years ago.
9. 9.▲
   by mariusmarais 6y ago

   According to that document, they only take action after four weeks of no response from the original owner. It doesn't say so explicitly, but to me it seems that a cordial "No" from the original author will probably be the end
10. 10.▲
    by mariusmarais 6y ago

    They don't. If insider information is suspected, the company can sue, and then prove it in court. See Waymo. This is infinitely better than automagically preventing employees from being employable after working for a specific company.
11. 11.▲
    by mariusmarais 6y ago

    This sounds more like the Oracle model than AWS. Or exactly what Docker just did if you squint a bit. In which case, just move.
12. 12.▲
    by mariusmarais 6y ago

    The blog post[0] answers that: peripherals spread between nodes. [0] https://turingpi.com/turing-pi-2-announcement/
13. 13.▲
    by mariusmarais 6y ago

    I don't think _you_ (nor I in my personal capacity) would, but your provider definitely should, and then you get the benefit. So if you're hosting via some accelerator like Cloudflare, AWS API Gateway, whatever Google has in this
14. 14.▲
    by mariusmarais 6y ago

    What you're proposing as a solution has already happened: Google relinquished their control over this protocol to the IETF, where it changed so much as to be incompatible with Google's original. Now they're updating their own
15. 15.▲
    by mariusmarais 6y ago

    I am personally very happy a company has come along to build something useful while charging a (fair?) price for it. So happy that we just bought a team license for Tailwind UI. Too many marketplaces exist where there is no value-add instea
16. 16.▲
    by mariusmarais 6y ago

    This is a nice tool and the Dockerfile is quite handy, but my guess is these books probably have a download limit per book since more used to be available. Maybe use the script's category or individual book modes to ensure more people