maradydd

5 ms·

1.
by maradydd 9y ago
Just FTR, your critique is answered by Stefan Lucks, Norina Grosch, and Joshua Koenig's paper[0] from last year's langsec workshop at IEEE Security and Privacy. They define a formalism, calc-regular languages, to handle length-pre
2.
by maradydd 10y ago
In other words, "if you're autistic and can't read body language, assume that nobody wants to talk to you." Real inclusive there, pal.
3.
by maradydd 10y ago
Hi. That's me you're quoting. > The status quo: highly funded white people in a ranch house, obsessive dreams of white supremacy floating into the night... Were you there? If not, then you're projecting. As it happens, the
4.
by maradydd 11y ago
Thanks! Those are all excellent papers. I am actually looking into formally verifying Hammer using Frama-C, but haven't gotten too far yet.
5.
by maradydd 12y ago
It's probably most accurate to say that gender isn't a significant factor in my calculus of attraction. I was born in Houston, though, and lived there for 23 years. For what it's worth, I don't recall intending anything
6.
by maradydd 13y ago
The W3C working group will eventually produce a crypto API standard, though whether that standard will meet the requirements you describe remains to be seen. In particular, it exposes primitives (the proposed API can definitely be called
7.
by maradydd 13y ago
Gosh, thank you!
8.
by maradydd 14y ago
I'd argue that in some cases there's a degree of control that can be developed, but also that this seems to be more the case for sensory triggers than for psychological ones.
9.
by maradydd 14y ago
I agree it's not the ideal UI. It's similar to what Darrell Issa's keepthewebopen.com was using with Madison, and to the marked-up texts that the EFF has produced as PDFs, but there's a cognitive jump (for me, at least) between "make a comm
10.
by maradydd 14y ago
That's a high-priority forthcoming CSS fix, you just bumped it higher. Thanks.
11.
by maradydd 14y ago
Basically the way I view it is like this: we know that lawyers and hackers only have some overlapping domain expertise, but we'll need to work together in order to achieve good tech law reform and everyone's going to have to get out of thei
12.
by maradydd 14y ago
Right. The current annotation UI, co-ment, does all of its versioning in a database. Distributed version control provides certain advantages over this, ones that we'd like to bring in quickly, but it's vital that we convey our goals to both
13.
by maradydd 14y ago
forkthelaw.org dev here. What you're seeing now is a weekend prototype using banged-together open-source projects, focused on a UI experience for people more on the tech-law end of the spectrum (the Jennifer Granicks and Cathy Elliott Jones
14.
by maradydd 14y ago
If Appelbaum is trying to educate the general public, he's doing a piss-poor job of it. Sagan, Dawkins and Chomsky approach[ed] the general public via the media and reach[ed] hundreds of millions of people. (Cosmos alone: over 500 million.
15.
by maradydd 14y ago
Weev may not be the hero Gotham City needs, but he's the one Gotham City's stuck with. That's the thing about the judicial system; you go to court with the defendant you have. The government may well have been counting on weev's reputation
16.
by maradydd 15y ago
Unfortunately no; it was unambiguously suicide. Depression is a horrible, horrible thing, both for those who experience it and the people who love them. Len was a brilliant, sensitive, loving man with the rotten luck to be too tormented by
17.
by maradydd 15y ago
I'm his wife. Sadly, the reports are true; I've been visiting family in the States and I got the call from the Leuven police department a couple of hours ago. He was the most brilliant man I ever met, and I still can't believe this is happe