mapcars

26 ms·

1.
by mapcars 13d ago
>MCP apparently reduces probabilistic failures Does it really do that much difference? I mean in the end robots process MCP output the same way they would process API docs.
2.
by mapcars 22d ago
Easily? The only one I'm aware of is Asahi Linux and they are still far away from having good level of support
3.
by mapcars 2mo ago
It seems like an attempt to port Svelte's features to React-like api?
4.
by mapcars 2mo ago
Interesting, I wonder what does no-runtime option mean, no event loop and no async code then?
5.
by mapcars 2mo ago
Interesting, I have been skeptical about .net as a platform, is it really open and doesn't lock you with microsoft in any way?
6.
by mapcars 2mo ago
Go, C# and .Net? And here I am wishing for typescript-like language for backend systems.
7.
by mapcars 2mo ago
I can't prove it in scientific ways, the thing is at some point scientists defined an atom as something indivisible, today we know they study sub atomic particles, and even finer things, waves or strings or whatever. In the same way 10
8.
by mapcars 2mo ago
Even human perception is able to peek into the infinite nature of things, not the intellect though, the intellect can only work with limited and defined "things".
9.
by mapcars 2mo ago
It's unknowable through current means of science. There are ways to experience that, I did some of them so I'm talking from my experience. And no, I can not prove it, if it was provable like that it would be already done.
10.
by mapcars 3mo ago
Reality does not have amount of details, it is infinite in all directions. Its only that we perceived certain amount of details, some more some less. One can spend their whole life mastering a single aspect and there always will be room to
11.
by mapcars 3mo ago
I'm not defending it, I'm saying "cringy sexist bullshit" is just a modern liberal western take. It could have been something like "people might see it problematic", and I agree with that.
12.
by mapcars 3mo ago
>I don't think I have that, really Thinking and doing is not the same. >people who objectify groups of other people What is the objectification here exactly? >you do not seem particularly open to criticism either. Right, and h
13.
by mapcars 3mo ago
Its the plague of western people thinking they have the moral high ground over other cultures and nations. In the place where I grew up this kind of scene would be considered normal. But you must be the one who dictates what is right and wh
14.
by mapcars 3mo ago
Comments on the internet are also optional, yet you do it
15.
by mapcars 3mo ago
Nice one, what I noticed is that out of 4 options 1 wrong is just something looking similar in letters, and 2 options are opposite meaning of each other - so actually the choice is 1 out of 2, not 4. Also many highest difficulty words are a
16.
by mapcars 3mo ago
>when everyone and their dog are either vibe-coding with Rust or constantly shouting about it's superiority, I've lost any interest in the language None of this makes Rust worse as a language
17.
by mapcars 3mo ago
You assume that its used to show advantage, but we are on a technical forum and for me, as an engineer, its always interesting what language or tech was used to create a project.
18.
by mapcars 4mo ago
I don't understand non-breedable part, mosquitoes are a part of a food chain as everything else, surely you don't think eliminating them will have no consequences?
19.
by mapcars 4mo ago
In my experience there are many problems with significant whitespaces, things like copying pieces of code require much more work, when indentation actually changes the logic you can not ask your tool to do it automatically - because there i
20.
by mapcars 4mo ago
Readable syntax with mandatory indentation is a very questionable idea. For me its easier to understand that something ends with a specific designation, not with a lack of it. Indentation should be solved by formatter and not the language.
21.
by mapcars 4mo ago
Now with AI I find myself in need for a space that can combine multiple repos into a single "project". For example for debugging an issue across the system, or asking it to verify if FE/BE communication schema has any mismatc
22.
by mapcars 4mo ago
Define ugly
23.
by mapcars 4mo ago
Interesting story showing how complex todays tech is, and your whole security plan can be compromised by regexp matching rules.
24.
by mapcars 4mo ago
I see this as a much more solid and mature take than those who "boo" about AI taking their jobs.
25.
by mapcars 4mo ago
I have no idea, in theory it might catch some miss-configured agents off-guard
26.
by mapcars 4mo ago
That's the smartest thing I saw in quite a while
27.
by mapcars 4mo ago
Did I say that there is no greed in LLM sphere? English is not my first language, still I'm pretty sure I didn't say that.
28.
by mapcars 4mo ago
AI has nothing to do with laziness or greediness. It makes things more efficient - and given that our time is limited strive for efficiency is a good thing.
29.
by mapcars 4mo ago
This is the thing - you define things "that matter" based on how they valued in terms of monetary compensation or social approval. But there are people who just enjoy playing a piano, there are people who just enjoy learning thing
30.
by mapcars 4mo ago
>WILL AI TAKE MY JOB? At this point I don't think its a concern, I think its going to happen sooner or later. 1st world countries have a bunch of support programs for the unemployed/homeless, so its not the end of the world. 3r

More ›