Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mandelbrotwurst
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
10mo ago
Why would the fact that it failed to follow one instruction increase the likelihood that it failed to follow others within the same response?
2.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
1y ago
Those conversations are an important part of the job. You can, for example, agree that something works in the sense that it is currently possible to use it to obtain a desired output, while simultaneously failing to work in various ways: It
3.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
1y ago
In what sense? An investor seeks a return on their investment. The former achieves this. The latter spends money for pleasure. I suppose you could argue that they are an investor seeking non-monetary return, but in that sense everyone is eq
4.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
1y ago
The article does state they were included, but is it "obviously" true that they should be? Who is more of an "investor", someone who purchases a primary residence to build equity or someone who purchases a second home to
5.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
1y ago
How do you estimate they will judge process legitimacy?
6.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
1y ago
It seems rather disappointing if typical management would make such impactful decisions so rapidly that their "on paper" analysis couldn't be made clever enough to consider more than a single variable.
7.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
1y ago
What does “direct democratic” mean in this context please?
8.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
2y ago
People might compete for the work they view as relatively more attractive for a variety of reasons even when they are quite busy.
9.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
2y ago
Do you find that your comprehension is as high at this rate as at a lower rate?
10.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
2y ago
Yeah, I hear you. It definitely feels like there's been a shift toward investing based on sentiment rather than fundamentals, and there's certainly an argument to be made that's not a good outcome for society. Personally I fe
11.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
2y ago
Most (all?) retirement plans offer you some amount of choice in funds to invest in, and most companies of the sort you're describing are not included in many of the more popular indices. For example, WeWork was never in the S&P 500
12.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
2y ago
Is the idea that the attacker is brute forcing the login method and they are less likely to be successful if the input must be passed in an unexpected format?
13.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
2y ago
> what actually led to the immigration Great point, and just FYI: "emigration" here.
14.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
2y ago
People in administrative roles such as HR, Compliance, Legal, Operations, Finance, Accounting.
15.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
2y ago
The premise is that the tax rate of millionaires is of interest as distinct from the tax rate of the typical person because millionaires are considered as having an above average amount of wealth, i.e. the topic at hand is how the wealthy a
16.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
What's the scam with the water filter?
17.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
Sure, and at the same time a PR can contain multiple commits. You don't have to squash and merge.
18.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
The average fund manager does not underperform by more than 2%.
19.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
You're correct about the square footage, but it would be incorrect to assume that because we were able to build X million units of size Y that we could have built 2X million units of size Y/2. It is cheaper per square foot to buil
20.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
Snark aside, there are other issues. What if someone has been betting frequently, but they've been winning so far? They'll be deemed "addicted" by this algorithm. Should they be? How much will it cost to administer this
21.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
> someone about to bet more than 99% of people How would you calculate this? By total bet volume alone? A very wealthy person can safely gamble more than a less wealthy one and might reasonably be gambling without being addicted despite
22.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
Thank you!
23.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
> Southern California only REMOTE Can you clarify what this means please? One job posting states just "Remote (US)". This makes me wonder whether there is some idea that you can work remotely but only if you are physically loca
24.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
> Integrating the tracking parameters into the path in a non-separable way is going to happen eventually, though. Ugh, please don't give them any ideas
25.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
> You can't measure any productivity that has any cognitive component. Are you able to elaborate on why this is true please?
26.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
> The NPS does a fine job at providing the visitor services that AREN'T totally commercialized (rangers, upkeep, lotteries, etc.) Some of those aspects of park operations have already been contracted out to a significant extent htt
27.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
Why would social democracy lead toward taxes being spent on needs rather than wants?
28.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
What is "Ancient Time"? Is that capitalization intentional? Edit: Oh, maybe you meant "Ancient Rome"?
29.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
I would suggest reading the summary of the news release and checking back in after that with any remaining, more specific questions.
30.
▲
by
mandelbrotwurst
3y ago
Sure, they'll be more predictive that way, and simultaneously it's valuable to not piss off your customers.
More ›