mama123

24 ms·

1.
by mama123 4y ago
So your point is let the conflict brew and let us isolate Russia but let us not help negotiate peace.
2.
by mama123 4y ago
And did you consult India before you orchestrated the regime changes and laid the seeds for conflict. India isn't a colony, and India is capable of and willing to be a mediator to bring peace, the west isn't or won't.
3.
by mama123 4y ago
It is more like India doesn't trust that the west actually has an intent of stopping the conflict. Or that Europe would in anyway want to give up on its Russian gas and oil, while pointing fingers at India which buys less than 1%. In f
4.
by mama123 4y ago
My suspicion here is that most people who bring up "caste" or Anti-Modi here on HN are not Hindus at all. Usually "upper caste" christians, Ashraf muslims/Paki or pro-congress children of super rich or super powerfu
5.
by mama123 4y ago
The speed at which things are improving in India combined with the restrictions in the covid lockdown has made many rethink their current situation. The lockdown has forced people to their homes with limited opportunities for outdoor activi
6.
by mama123 4y ago
I have now been living in the happiest country in the world for more than a decade. As an Indian kid growing up on Cartoon Network, I was quite envious of western kids with skateboards and actual skate parks, tons of toys, gizmos and game c
7.
by mama123 5y ago
Caught between Mullahs & BJP, I am sure any sane Muslim will choose the BJP. The only ones who hate BJP are also the Ashraf ones, who are worried about loosing their privileges.
8.
by mama123 5y ago
When people refer to themselves as TamBram, they are just referring to their heritage. If you are offend by them carrying their tradition or culture that they have inherited for 100s of generation. How would you then think of Indians named
9.
by mama123 5y ago
In many parts of India muslims block off roads and public spaces to "offer namaz". This is illegal in may islamic countries in the Middle East. Many countries in "liberal" Europe have banned the hijab. Amnesty is not a r
10.
by mama123 5y ago
Two of the main perpetrators were christians, the movie deliberately substituted it with names and symbolism connected to a specific caste with the intent of falsely sowing discord between the communities while whitewashing the Christian an
11.
by mama123 5y ago
Not everyone has to be a David or John or a Mohamed or Abdulla. India is a diverse country with many subcultures, each with their own unique traditions dating back many thousands of years. Why should everyone loose their unique identity? Wh
12.
by mama123 5y ago
Many Poor muslims just as many poor Indian are now getting electricity, subsidised toilets, zero balance bank accounts, direct benefits transfer for the first time under BJP rule. Many muslim women are for the first time are freed from trip
13.
by mama123 5y ago
Much of what the English speaking elite in India & much of the west consumes as a theory on caste is a handiwork of a colonial-evangelist mission. So much of it has to be taken with a boatload of salt. Since it is politically incorrect
14.
by mama123 5y ago
As with racism, casteism does exist among people with lower economic, intellectual or competency trying to compensate.
15.
by mama123 5y ago
The movie is quite controversial as it twists reality to target and tarnish specific castes. The perpetrators in real life were Christians but portrayed as Hindus. The Hindu villagers who in real life helped the victim seek justice are port
16.
by mama123 5y ago
Historically peoples names included their village name, son of x and their caste/jaati - which indicated their profession or specialization. That meant getting new business when introducing themselves in the neighboring village. This i
17.
by mama123 5y ago
There isn't any proof that the Romani left because of their caste. There is a strong evidence that they might have been driven away by the Islamic invasions, because their timelines coincide.