madibo3156

5 ms·

1.
by madibo3156 6d ago
The mechanism is interesting, but I'm not fully understanding the importance. We say it was done this way because a user would appreciate the speedup. The difference is one traversal versus expected one and one-half traversals. How slo
2.
by madibo3156 7d ago
Part skeptic and part zetetic, what prompt would you have used? My impression is that this is an oversimplified demonstration of what can happen when you prompt Claude in a system with many more variables (than two buttons and two colours).
3.
by madibo3156 13d ago
It's not stated plainly in the article what the problem is, so here: Each participant rolls a die. For there to be no possibility of a tie, no die can share a face number with another die—every face across all dice must be unique. For
4.
by madibo3156 19d ago
> Amid the overall electronics boom thanks to A.I., … one piece of electronics is almost unchanged financially. That is the digital display or flat-panel monitor. …is the full quote. Come on, guys.
5.
by madibo3156 21d ago
Is it sophisticated? Maybe. Is it the alignment problem? Exhibits qualities of it, yes. Is it surprising? No. The event strikes me as reminiscent of one's first go at programming, without familiarity of computer code: Tell the compu
6.
by madibo3156 26d ago
Nobody's said it in this thread so I'll drop it here where you ask "Why save physical books?"— The problem isn't with morals or copyright. What we're up in arms about is case law. Past rulings have implied that
7.
by madibo3156 1mo ago
But Wikipedia has done a good job of it. If Google's AI summaries could actually provide correct answers with verifiable sources without so-called hallucinations, it would be good. You could argue that people don't actually check
8.
by madibo3156 1mo ago
This guy is severely milking it now. If learning means building an inaccurate and incomplete understanding of the topic then go hog wild. Otherwise https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49209049 sums up my feelings about the
9.
by madibo3156 2mo ago
It sounds like you're talking about the "gloss" era with "juicy" buttons, which some people are retroactively referring to as Frutiger Aero. Yes, things definitely look more 3D in that design. It's currently co
10.
by madibo3156 2mo ago
Yeah. You'll notice that there's a mix of light and dark. Some segments are light-on-dark, then it switches to dark-on-light. It appears to me like a "design trend" that's at odds with accessibility. https:/&#
11.
by madibo3156 2mo ago
And just as quickly he was pulled back into the crab bucket.
12.
by madibo3156 2mo ago
This is all very deep in the weeds, biased and opinionated, so it's hard for me to draw my own conclusion with all the missing facts that may or may not exist from Apple's side. What I will say is that it's very funny that Ap
13.
by madibo3156 2mo ago
> Amazon has excellent and consistent customer support We've been dealing with different Amazons. Also, credit cards in my experience are built to deal with that stuff. Have you encountered protection issues by using your credit car
14.
by madibo3156 2mo ago
That's a good example of bad UX, and, in a way, counter to the article. It sounds like Android needs a middle state indicator. When your action is in a pending state, the state indicator should not be the same as the previous state.
15.
by madibo3156 3mo ago
The share images showing where putts landed is super cool.
16.
by madibo3156 3mo ago
My friend, I know you think you're defending your position well, but you've done the opposite. Scrolling to the bottom of the comments and seeing this response from you is like speedrunning your books' one-star reviews and co
17.
by madibo3156 3mo ago
As a consumer, I can appreciate your focus on support. I get a monthly $0.00 AWS bill on an account I've lost access to. However, because I have no outstanding balance, support is unable to assist me (is their claim). So I enjoy one mo
18.
by madibo3156 4mo ago
The proof is that you Google this right now and find multiple corroborations across the web from today.
19.
by madibo3156 4mo ago
Top researchers say AI will automate all cognitive labor by 2045 at the latest. 5 years ago I would've thought you're joking. Today, I think you're being serious, but I still think you're wrong.
20.
by madibo3156 4mo ago
In theory you're right, in practice you're not.
21.
by madibo3156 4mo ago
I find this annoying too. "Sleep" is okay, but the quippy headlines ("need sleep"—short, snappy and vague) infiltrating journals bother me. I've seen it well before LLMs, but as an example, there is a long list of t
22.
by madibo3156 4mo ago
Pointers are hard
23.
by madibo3156 4mo ago
Comment reads at least partially like human writing, for it is terse and does not try to make a point.
24.
by madibo3156 5mo ago
I haven't read them because they're now buried, but whatever those top comments said can't be bad enough to warrant your vitriol. Abysmal means bad, not pessimistic. It's inappropriate for the (currently) top comment to
25.
by madibo3156 5mo ago
AI to write code makes more sense because the grammar is almost infinitesimally smaller and of all the practical repercussions that come with that. Think, yes, verifiability, but also tone, terseness etc. and how big those "problem spa
26.
by madibo3156 5mo ago
Yes, let's build a bridge with AI
27.
by madibo3156 5mo ago
Are the points invalid or uninteresting? If so, argue about that.