machomaster

6 ms·

1.
by machomaster 3d ago
You should read on the history of Finnish nuclear reactors. The disaster of Olkiluoto showed that French can't be trusted. USA (Westinghouse) nuclesr development was/is in the gutter as well, plus there are risks giving it to the
2.
by machomaster 3d ago
80k of donations in less than 2 weeks is quite a lot, compared to a lot of other open-source projects. Heck, Linux Mint gets 15k a month. And yeah, you are missing the point. The original claim was about 100% of money coming from DHH's
3.
by machomaster 4d ago
> The donations are 100% budy-budy and rich kids rubbing shoulders. Nothing else / more than that. Means that you haven't been looking. Your 100% figure is incorrect for the mere fact of Omarchy having hundreds of ordinary peop
4.
by machomaster 4d ago
It's clear that you don't know anything about guys at GN.
5.
by machomaster 4d ago
Maybe you should have kept your eyes open and allow them to see the real world, instead of living in a fantasy land.
6.
by machomaster 4d ago
No. Euler solution would have bith names, this was not up to debate. The discussion was about the solution for NS, which was solved by OpenAI, but not by B&A. OpenAI proposed B a cooperation on NS (were super-nice and threw him a bone,
7.
by machomaster 4d ago
> 15 millions dollars that is supposed to "support the linux desktop", but right now is mostly funding its own distro. There is no general destination to support Linux Desktop. Linux Foundation is not that, in addition to havin
8.
by machomaster 5d ago
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend". If despicable individuals start hating on somebody, reasonable people will have a positive view by default and will be more compelled to try what crazies are trying to ban. "I don't
9.
by machomaster 5d ago
Incorrect. He doesn't blame non-natives. He blames native politicians for allowing incompatible (sic!) non natives in, in way too large numbers. He tells about the problem, the cause of it, and describes how there has been an increased
10.
by machomaster 5d ago
There would not be a critical control over the reactor, just the opposite. Finland would control everything and could have even bought fuel elsewhere. Loviisa station is Soviet-built, has been working amazingly well and till this day has be
11.
by machomaster 5d ago
Because the idea of the nuclear plant was to get: 1. Consistent stable long-term energy 2. Controlled by Finland, to minimize all kinds of risks (war foreign influence, cut sea cables, worsening of relationships with other countries, marke
12.
by machomaster 5d ago
Russia builds a lot of reactors as well. Hence, they were hired to build the Hanhikivi one in Finland, after the French disaster. Unfortunately, the project was cancelled for moronic political reasons.
13.
by machomaster 5d ago
It would be incredibly easy to justify helping Ukraine against Putin's terrorism, yet here we are.
14.
by machomaster 5d ago
> I can say the first LLM generated proof Levent sent me was the most horrendous I have ever read; we verified it on Lean on August 22nd. Since this point, we have been working around the clock to understand this proof and turn it into s
15.
by machomaster 5d ago
Not to snatch the prize, but: 1. to test their new model 2. to be able to say "you came with the proof, but our model can do this too" 3. to verify the result. This is also a great thing for the math. Of course, it makes sense to
16.
by machomaster 5d ago
That's not what happened, though. They sugggested a cooperation with the other guy, using OpenAI's resources and OpenAI's solution of NS to work on and publish NS proof (that those other guys didn't have). Of course, Ope
17.
by machomaster 6d ago
Premature optimization is a common sin in software development. One of the reasons is that in the beginning of the process you don't even understand the problem fully. Heck, often you don't understand it even when you actually enc
18.
by machomaster 6d ago
To try to tone police in 2026, you sound insufferable.
19.
by machomaster 6d ago
I was absolutely calm, not outraged at all. Please check the other 2 answers I gave, they answered your questions as well.
20.
by machomaster 6d ago
Linux is great in that it has options. No distro is the best for everyone. Different people can subjectively and honestly like different distros. And this is an amazingly good thing. If you are happy with NixOS, then good for you. Genuinely
21.
by machomaster 6d ago
Popularity is correlated with quality. Not necessarily in the absolute sense, but in the realistic sense of betterness, while taking other important aspects like price into account. Panther was a more technically advanced and expensive tank
22.
by machomaster 7d ago
Nix's old 20+ year design vs. a new design by professional product managers, programmers, designers. It's clear what is superior. The fact that Nix is barely used by anyone, speaks volumes about Nix's age and uselessness. Peo
23.
by machomaster 7d ago
> Nothing that Omarchy provides is important Hundreds of thousands on people beg to disagree.
24.
by machomaster 8d ago
You can never prove the negative.
25.
by machomaster 8d ago
Oh, you must be one of those anti-White racists... > White Democrats showed the effect: they imposed a somewhat weaker norm against offensive statements targeting Whites than against statements targeting other racial groups. > So ther
26.
by machomaster 8d ago
Use MakeResolveDeb to easily install on Ubuntu/Mint.
27.
by machomaster 8d ago
Installing on Mint/Ubuntu is easy with MakeResolveDeb. https://www.danieltufvesson.com/makeresolvedeb The biggest issues are the supports of video cards (nvidia is the king) and different popular codecs. The problem is
28.
by machomaster 8d ago
This is a good place to share that MakeResolveDeb makes installing Davinci Resolve very easy on Ubuntu/Mint/Debian Way more people should know about this solution. https://www.danieltufvesson.com/makeresolvedeb
29.
by machomaster 11d ago
True. Conservatives are more tolerant of people with differing views than progressives are. Women are the worst at that. The research was done to measure the level of intolerance students had towards people of different views. Women were 3
30.
by machomaster 11d ago
> I haven't talked personally with a racist in probably 25-30 years. Let me guess, you mostly mingle with white people? It's a different story among Latinos, Asians (toward blacks and other Asians), but especially among African

More ›