mach1ne

6 ms·

1.
by mach1ne 3y ago
If you make one solution impossible, another one pops up.
2.
by mach1ne 3y ago
That last part reads like an activation phrase for a sleeper agent
3.
by mach1ne 3y ago
Manna v0.7
4.
by mach1ne 3y ago
Your link is interesting, but I don't like your take on somehow this argument between behaviorism and Chomsky being solved and the former being now "ridiculous looking back". This is just the dance of theories, and as a matte
5.
by mach1ne 3y ago
Oh, but this is interesting. If some countries stand to gain more by declaring copyrighted works "fair use" for training generative models, then other countries can either fall in line or risk falling back in technological develop
6.
by mach1ne 3y ago
>This was the state of affairs throughout most of the 20th century, and it set neuroscience back decades. This doesn't seem to be based on anything.
7.
by mach1ne 3y ago
It's not for a cool 20 minute video. It's for the collective viewing time of some 2.2 billion minutes of entertainment. There is no reason to use bootstrap-budget on the supply when the demand is this high.
8.
by mach1ne 3y ago
It’s nonsensical to claim that to prove something you have to disprove alternate explanations. In an information environment where confirmable facts are scarse, you get the clearest vision by operating on probability. And on black-swan-tier
9.
by mach1ne 3y ago
Interstellar travel is possible even with the physics we know. A sub-light civilization could colonize the entirety of Milky Way in a million years or so. The question is what the probability is for an intelligent species to evolve per sola
10.
by mach1ne 3y ago
Roswell isn't known to be anything to the general public. The public has a similar fog-of-war on Roswell as it has on the modern unidentified aerial phenomena. Therefore stigmatizing one group unfortunately stigmatizes the other group
11.
by mach1ne 3y ago
I've always found that saying dumb. It's basically stating that this is the null hypothesis, and you have to have p = 0.001 to convince me otherwise. When dealing with complex questions of which we have but datapoints, the probabi
12.
by mach1ne 3y ago
In theory, but in practice things aren’t that neat; anti-competitive practices and credibility are some items which enable bloat
13.
by mach1ne 3y ago
True, especially regarding how easily their services can be replicated. Their margins are low, and customer acquisition does not provide them with network effects that would yield a moat.
14.
by mach1ne 3y ago
Depends on what you mean by ’wrapper’. For most AI startups it isn’t viable to train their own models. For most customer use-cases, ChatGPT interface isn’t enough. Wrappers are currently the only logical implementation of AI to production.
15.
Superconductors, Extraterrestrials and Predictions(exlibris.fyi)
3 points by mach1ne 3y ago|0 comments
16.
by mach1ne 3y ago
PTSD is more than a layer of indirection, it’s a bed for the current direction of research focused on trauma. Shell shock isn’t a good term for home abuse for example, but the current dogma is that similar neurological mechanisms underly th
17.
by mach1ne 3y ago
I’m still not sure if the OP was joking.
18.
by mach1ne 3y ago
Then again, the rover would have found the sub from the location even if it were intact, and there could have been a small chance of survival since they had the equipment. Hope is more important than agony.
19.
by mach1ne 3y ago
That's luckily not relevant here. Multiple sources have independently confirmed the same rumors. This means that there is a significant probability of it being true.
20.
by mach1ne 3y ago
Is there some reason why RNNs can’t be used as a trace at the end of the context window, as a ’medium-term’ memory of sorts?
21.
by mach1ne 3y ago
Maybe there’s enough money in Europe that investors who were anxious to join the AI train jumped the gun. Indeed the whole thing is sketchy.
22.
by mach1ne 3y ago
Interesting that music works for you. I’ve noticed that besides just white noise, music significantly degrades my work results. I might produce similar amounts of content line-wise, but the solutions are of much lower quality when I listen
23.
by mach1ne 3y ago
>"stochastic parrot" is a term coined by Emily M. Bender in the 2021 artificial intelligence research paper "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?" This might be the first time the term
24.
by mach1ne 3y ago
I'm European and the main problem I remember was the fear of losing credit card information. Old people are still scared.
25.
by mach1ne 3y ago
It was laughed at by consumers. There was a time not long ago when buying anything from internet was considered taboo because, you said it, fear of losing your credit card information to scammers.
26.
by mach1ne 3y ago
That’s not even close to being the main problem in launching a Reddit competitor. Reddit moderators are unpaid. Content moderation not being automated is not a problem. People like to do it for free. The problem is the user base. Biggest ob
27.
by mach1ne 3y ago
The headline feels like from an alternate 1940s timeline.
28.
by mach1ne 3y ago
UBI is easier to understand conceptually. There could be more advantages to it though, over negative income tax, but they’re a bit difficult to discover.
29.
by mach1ne 3y ago
I, for one, do believe watermarking solutions exist. One thing you cannot escape with LLMs is content meaning. As a simple example, the secret watermark could be hidden in the embeddings of the sequence of words. To make the watermark more
30.
by mach1ne 3y ago
Rather biased, too. Though in this case towards the preferences of the user.

More ›