macguyvermectin

10 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by macguyvermectin 2y ago

   It's not a problem. It's basic autonomy. My life is my own, and I am not state property. And, frankly, what makes you think I'd be willing to raise somebody else's children if I don't want to have children of my own
2. 2.▲
   by macguyvermectin 2y ago

   You're using Bootstrap for a personal website? Who are you trying to impress? And why are you returning HTTP 406 to Firefox ESR versions?
3. 3.▲
   by macguyvermectin 3y ago

   This is how he does it. https://starbreaker.org/reject.js All I had to do was right-click and select "view source"? It's not like he minifies his HTML to hell and back like people do on commercial sites, but
4. 4.▲
   by macguyvermectin 3y ago

   No, and it shouldn’t be treated as one. Nobody needs YouTube, and the only videos on YouTube that can’t be replaced with blogs are music videos and cat videos.
5. 5.▲
   by macguyvermectin 3y ago

   If you have a PS5, Ghost of Tsushima is a better “Assassin’s Creed” than Ubisoft will ever make.
6. 6.▲
   by macguyvermectin 3y ago

   I think it should be obvious that I have a right to decide whether server-imposed JavaScript and CSS will run on my computer. If I only want HTML to render, that’s my prerogative. And if a site’s HTML isn’t useable without CSS and JS, then