mQu

101 ms·

1.
Finding correlations in time series data(erdem.pl)
1 points by mQu 6y ago|0 comments
2.
by mQu 11y ago
Because it looks good on r/unixporn ;-) But more to the point - it fits with many keyboard only work flows and/or tiling WMs (i3, awesome, etc). At least that's what it's good in it for me. One less context switch.
3.
Cache Directory Tagging Standard (2004)(brynosaurus.com)
1 points by mQu 11y ago|0 comments
4.
by mQu 11y ago
Hey, I'm an engineer. All I need is an investor. Anyone? ;-)
5.
by mQu 11y ago
I wouldn't say that Internet always watching can have the same effect because it's just mob of peers (humans) and ultimately can be ignored or fooled. God by definition can't. That why the concept can be disciplinary and ubiq
6.
by mQu 11y ago
Yes and no. In my tests with live traffic (fingerprint,ip) tuple was as good as standard tracking cookie. Sometimes even better because I could match "incognito" modes as well. This was however only for desktop browsers. Mobile h
7.
by mQu 12y ago
Ofc a blog describing your experience would be just that knowledge promoting that i have in mind so kudos for that (and i'll be keeping an eye for it because it is a hard problem to get right).
8.
by mQu 12y ago
But it's missing the point - just like other comments said - if you need this you're doing it wrong. I sure was guilty of big sites just as much as the next guy. It just saddens me that insted of promoting what we've learned
9.
by mQu 12y ago
Not realy. A user with a slow connection will know that and wait (because the problem will be global). Adding a preloader is just bloat that will make the site load even longer (and just piss off the user as he'll know that some of his
10.
by mQu 12y ago
Why is this any different than Flash preloaders just a moment ago? And even worse - it doesn't show any progress so there isn't any user feedback. Every (bad) pattern seems to repeat itself. Just using current-cool-tech. I would m
11.
by mQu 12y ago
But there it is with Hearbleed in the same cnet article so it must be serious. So serious. Wow.
12.
by mQu 12y ago
Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems that this isn't even old news. It's by design - something inherent to OAuth authentication scheme. Also both CNet and the original are so light on details it's scary. I get the feelin
13.
by mQu 13y ago
Do I understand correctly that browsers obtain source code through bridge (local HTTP server?) from Avatar network or is it downloaded traditionally? EDIT (from here to end): to clarify - my question is to assess security of the 'runt