m0a0t0

12 ms·

1.
by m0a0t0 4y ago
>I am making no moral judgement here You talk with seeming disgust about sex, I think you are. >And allowing stigma to influence public policy decisions is harmful to the far greater majority Yes, because if there is one thing straigh
2.
by m0a0t0 4y ago
Here's Reagan's press secretary laughing and joking about "the gay plague" when only a few hundred had died, you homophobic ghoul https://www.vox.com/2015/12/1/9828348/ronald-reagan-hi
3.
by m0a0t0 4y ago
>It was the same with the aids epidemic, the gay community ignored/denied/downplayed the demographic localization of HIV but the truth was that at it's height if you were not a gay male the epidemic was effectively irrelev
4.
by m0a0t0 4y ago
If the close contact during sex is a good way to get infected then it makes sense that a group that are largely cut off sexually from the rest of the population would see it first. I think this information is from the UK where MSM are more
5.
by m0a0t0 9y ago
"the performance can be close to par with native apps" That has not been my experience with any electron app. They are dog slow across the board
6.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
No. State school. Shit area.
7.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
It's rarely seen in normal society as well. I really don't understand where this person is coming from.
8.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
It doesn't just assume knowledge of the language though. Assuming knowledge of Applicative, Monad and Functor is fine but as the current top comment says there is a lot more than that. Most of which you wouldn't find in a normal H
9.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
You can still do state using the state monad. > this gives almost all of the advantages of Haskell except one of the biggest ones - the type system. Obviously this is subjective though. Some people prefer dynamic typing :)
10.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
To be fair most of the trending github projects are libraries for use in Haskell. There are very few actual applications - there is pandoc, git-annex and hakyll and that is it.
11.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
Perhaps the reason people are not commenting on the correctness as much is that it is, broadly, correct. It's quite difficult to add to a discussion when it's already right - there's no debate to be had.
12.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
It seems, from the comments here, that speaking and donating against equal rights is a protected freedom but as soon as anyone is called out for it then that isn't allowed.
13.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
He can say what he likes, doesn't mean he isn't free from the consequences. Views that are wrong should be allowed to be held and said, but not be supported; especially by a company like Mozilla
14.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
I well reasoned, considered argument. Unlikely nearly all the comments here.
15.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
Well when the thing they are lying about is a view which is harmful then I see no problem.
16.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
Not if I support the cause but if the cause is right. This is also not a witch-hunt. I honestly cannot believe that people are so apathetic about equality
17.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
Sometimes you have to vote for the lesser evil. It's pragmatism. Choose between the person who will try and stop gay marriage from happening by enshrining it in law or the person who won't actively stop it (or someone who has no c
18.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
Why is it that for some people political correctness - something which tries to make people respect one another more and be nice - is the devil. You have the right to say almost whatever you want. That doesn't mean you fucking should
19.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
I did. Perhaps I should have phrased my reply a bit better: People who criticise another person for an act which is contentious is not going to produce a drop in market share. Perhaps even this is not obvious enough for you. You're pro
20.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
But he did give money that denied people's rights, so by your (weird, wrong and stupid definition) of fascist he is one. There is no mob, there are a few people and the "demand" is worded rather weakly. I would have expected
21.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
It hasn't always been about religion, possibly community though. Doing away with government marriages if it was for everyone. At the moment it is important because it has tax benefits and not having it equal makes gay people seem like
22.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
Because equal marriage is really, really important. When gay people are not accepted in society opposing something that would improve that greatly is a bad thing to do
23.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
I think one of the big problems is that he is head of Mozilla which has a reputation of being a do good organisation. Having someone who did bad (as some people would say) isn't really in line with that
24.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
So preventing equality is not bigotry then? I would argue that calling out something like that is noble, not fascist. Labelling the people who criticised Eich as fascists is as bad as calling him one for his beliefs.
25.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
I don't think one person criticising another is going to cause a massive drop in market share. You really are being a little silly
26.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
Because he actively went out to limit peoples rights. Those who are silent on the matter are not actively harming LGBT people and I think it would be known if the companies were not inclusive. In the world of businesses (and even Mozilla) i
27.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
> by trying to shame people who prefer other tools by calling them dullards and telling them that they don't know what they are doing. I think this a minority but I have seen this. Generally with languages that have their roots in t
28.
by m0a0t0 12y ago
I think if he had thought better of it he would have released some sort of statement on it. Until then he actively tried to prevent equality and should be called out on it.
29.
by m0a0t0 13y ago
You may want to try cabal sandboxes. I think it's a similar idea to virtualenv in python
30.
by m0a0t0 13y ago
I would trust him, someone from Europe, over a person who has "travelled" there. You really need to live in a place to get to know it's culture at anything more that a superficial level. At a superficial level, for example, A

More ›