lushootseed

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by lushootseed 16y ago

   Unless every human being can reproduce the issue with precision, it is a non-issue and neonfunk will be skeptical. Sir, We are not talking about newton's third law here. There could very well defective units or other factors come into play.
2. 2.▲
   by lushootseed 16y ago

   Wow! Daring Fireball is indeed an Apple Fanboy! He advocates the fact the the world's best tech company cannot really solve such a trivial issue like removal of built-in apps and instead suggests a workaround and hide them!! Any programmer
3. 3.▲
   by lushootseed 16y ago

   raganwald completely got the anologies wrong. Unless he buys his next car online which would be soon to be released without looking at what features it has (e.g. mpg, v6 or v8,HP, leather trim or not). He sees Luxus brand and just buys it.
4. 4.▲
   by lushootseed 16y ago

   http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/159565/mac_os_... It says there were 48+ security fixes. Doesn't matter what the reality is. People just want to believe Apple is more secure.
5. 5.▲
   by lushootseed 16y ago

   Wow! Apple certainly gets a free pass when it comes to scrutiny. Apple is definitely playing in the gray area when it comes to anti-competitive practices. google voice rejection and a whole lot of apps that got rejected had no good reason e