lurker69

6 ms·

1.
by lurker69 9y ago
Yup I have already seen threads with screenshots from linkedn pages of some of those people. I guess that just as in US, where Youtube is using partisan and highly controversial NGOs like ADL and SPLC; they are using equally ideologically
2.
by lurker69 9y ago
Youtube publicly stated that they are working with SPLC and ADL on Youtubes Trusted Flagger Program. I am not implying that this was plan of evil CEOs from the start. But they let it happen. They let political bias seep in and steer public
3.
by lurker69 9y ago
Its not a mistake and its not a coincidence that this happened. Youtube employed a lot of left wing NGOs like SPLC and ADL and lots of similar left wing authoritarians. Left wing commentators were cheering the news that InfoWars might get b
4.
by lurker69 9y ago
Here is sans paywall link: https://archive.is/hB3eo No mention of FSB in that article.
5.
by lurker69 9y ago
Many consider whole Daily Stormer webpage as satire. Majority of their readers read it for its creative but controversial humor. Twitter sat ladies that cry bullied this big IT companies to deny service for Daily Stormer caused webpage to n
6.
by lurker69 9y ago
I stand corrected: Andrew Auernheimer · @weev A Cloudflare executed says they ditched us because "email on this is massive." So much for an anti-DDoS company. The only traffic you have to send them just has to be in the form of va
7.
by lurker69 9y ago
They sure have less humor on their web pages than Daily Stormes has. And dont forget antifa painted graffiti in Berkeley saying "Liberaly get the bullet too" Oh and New Jersey DHS recently declared them domestic terrorist group.
8.
by lurker69 9y ago
Andrew Auernheimer · @weev A Cloudflare executed says they ditched us because "email on this is massive." So much for an anti-DDoS company. The only traffic you have to send them just has to be in the form of valid SMTP, and they&
9.
by lurker69 9y ago
There are AntiFa, BLM and even ISIS sites on Cloudflare.
10.
by lurker69 9y ago
Cloudflare also kicks people off when they get ddos'd for too long. Two days ago whe GoDady booted them, and Jester was running campaign against Daily Stormer, CloudFlares statement was that they wont bot them based on brigading flaggi
11.
by lurker69 9y ago
cloudflare also kicks people off when they get ddos'd for too long
12.
by lurker69 9y ago
Joke policing is absolutely wrong and one of best indicators at judging how authoritarian people are. Everyone who supports this or pretends that jokes are serious hate speech with intention to suppress someones right for free speech is wor
13.
by lurker69 9y ago
Julian is not exactly example of perfect gentleman, but his was surely great move for his popularity. Many women hate him already anyways, so not much was lost. https://imgur.com/a/jy7BU
14.
by lurker69 9y ago
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-I... If you read it, it was about his opinions about damage that Ideological Echo Chamber causes to company. This discussion needs to happen at google. An
15.
by lurker69 9y ago
I think he knew what he was doing and correctly predicted reaction. If you have been following anti-SJW (for lack of better term) authors lately you can see exactly same pattern repeating over and over. After all he signed memo with his nam
16.
by lurker69 9y ago
Maybe. I have been reading that Bannon wants to start regulating big social media platforms as utilities, to limit their censoring and promoting narrative capabilities. https://theintercept.com/2017/07/27/stev
17.
by lurker69 9y ago
No reason was given. Peterson tweeted about it. And said that even access to his gmail account was revoked for braking policy. He said no details were given. Then he tweeted that they reviewed revocation it and still didnt restore account.
18.
by lurker69 9y ago
Yes term is mostly used as an insult. But there just isnt any other term that would replace it and include all those counterproductive radical left groups that relay on character assassination when faced with logical points they cant refute
19.
by lurker69 9y ago
Not sure whats so sexist about that statement. Women traditionally raise children and take care of nest, while men provide resources for family. On average. It can be different, but this is how most families function. This is the same as wo
20.
by lurker69 9y ago
He might have planned all this. He was apparently chess champion as a child. * Mentioning of left echo chamber was pandering to the right. And he got huge support form right leaning and centrist media and personalities. * Biological differe
21.
by lurker69 9y ago
Its a question what was worse for PR. Firing him just proved his point. He said that google created environment, where people whos opinions are not completely aligned with left echo chamber dogma, cant express their views safely. ... And he
22.
by lurker69 9y ago
I think he knew very well what he was doing. >As a child, Damore was a chess champion, earning the FIDE Master title, putting him in the >99th percentile, according to his CV. and > Damore plans to sue Google; he had previously com
23.
by lurker69 9y ago
This memo doesnt claim at any point that women should not be in tech. It just presents some reasons why there are less women in tech than men. Reasons that are not only sexism and patriarchy. But it does claim that Google created environmen
24.
by lurker69 9y ago
This blog mentions some poll that was apparently made among google employees. But link to picture is broken :/ http://motls.blogspot.si/2017/08/james-damore-deserves-1-mil... > As Damore reminded us, most
25.
by lurker69 9y ago
This market force might actually change in future. In this case it seems that James planned all this to happen and is gonna sue Google: > "$1 million in bonuses" was changed to "$100 million as a compensation" after D
26.
by lurker69 9y ago
I think he was smart and planned all of this. I am reading that he has previously complained to NLRB and plans to sue Google for firing him arguing that his dismissal was a revenge. And by reading memo instead of its misinterpretations on f
27.
by lurker69 9y ago
Yeah, I havent seen any concise and rational debunking of any of his points. I did see a lot of partisanship and accusation of misogyny that I cant find in memo at all. To me this looks like some smart guy saying that google doesnt tolerate
28.
by lurker69 9y ago
Yeah I also didnt get feeling from reading the memo that is was misogynistic. James just tried to point out that reasons for gender gab in tech might not be only sexism as current left leaning agenda dictates. I understood memo more like co
29.
by lurker69 9y ago
After reading this and some other comment sections and blogs I still haven seen single of his "stupid views" refuted in concise and logical manner, without relying on assumptions that only sexism and biases in hiring are cause of
30.
by lurker69 9y ago
> If gender-based diversity programs are responsible... > If... Nothing empirical in that sentence just assumption. And even if we assume that statement is true, on the other side of same coin are qualified men that didn't get jo

More ›