lunchbucket

10 ms·

1.
by lunchbucket 5d ago
Obviously, and they deserve no credit for the bare minimum. But if you imagine them doing the opposite and not taking any steps to rectify the error, that would clearly be closer to a "coverup".
2.
by lunchbucket 5d ago
And if they had instead chosen to remain silent on the origin of the code, how would you have characterized their actions then?
3.
by lunchbucket 13d ago
Not sure what you're talking about. Playing games has been a research topic in AI for much longer than transformer models have existed.
4.
by lunchbucket 13d ago
We're so back
5.
by lunchbucket 26d ago
But it's at least plausible the person you're berating is responsible for the error.
6.
by lunchbucket 26d ago
That's interesting but raised the same question, why berate a machine? Either the agent is not a person, in which case, anything it does wrong is your fault. Or it is a person, it can be blamed for mistakes, but then we can't in g
7.
by lunchbucket 3mo ago
This is what we call a "time of check/time of use" issue.
8.
by lunchbucket 3mo ago
You might consider emailing hn@ycombinator.com and asking about the standing of your account.
9.
by lunchbucket 3mo ago
It's bizarre to me that you aren't acknowledging the context these remarks were made in, I don't understand where you're coming from at all. Like, you've seen what article this thread is discussing right...?
10.
by lunchbucket 3mo ago
They told you what they know. Maybe there's enterprise contracts with different prices, maybe there aren't - but evidently this person either isn't aware or can't disclose what they know, and it seems like it's the
11.
by lunchbucket 3mo ago
It's silly to compare an arbitrary connection to a non-arbitrary connection and as if it makes the former arbitrary. You're doubling down on a category error.
12.
by lunchbucket 4mo ago
The odds that someone meaningfully reflects on their behavior when you tell them they're what's wrong with HN are pretty slim. You can substantially increase those odds by being more neutral about it. It's entirely possible H
13.
by lunchbucket 4mo ago
If you care about the quality of the site, consider the guidelines about not responding to a bad comment with a worse one and not griping about how HN has gotten terrible or turned into reddit or what there you. Downvote, flag, and move on
14.
by lunchbucket 4mo ago
They understand, they just don't care and shouldn't care. It is always jarring to encounter someone with a different life experience, but processing that is your business. They don't need to spend the rest of their life craft
15.
by lunchbucket 4mo ago
Becoming addicted to a substance is harm, so being addictive is a risk. Nicotine is not harmless. It is a teratogen, it may exacerbate cancers you already have, it can harm brain development in young users, it can cause high blood pressure,
16.
by lunchbucket 4mo ago
Smoking/smoke inhalation is not safe, it leads to all the bad outcomes you mention, and I encourage everyone to seek out alternatives like oral nicotine pouches and cannabis gummies. They will almost certainly improve your healthspan a
17.
by lunchbucket 4mo ago
It's a serious concern and switching to synthetic nicotine products may prolong your life. All tobacco products are highly carcinogenic. Contrary to what was said earlier it is not really about the smoking (though of course that makes
18.
by lunchbucket 4mo ago
Maybe you should look into where statistics that are "going around" are sourced from. This seems to be something an anti-immigration lobby cooked to in 2014, which was an artifact of their analysis; they considered workers aged 16
19.
by lunchbucket 4mo ago
Just so you know, I thought your project was cool, I upvoted it, but I had to retract my upvote after seeing your behavior here in the comments. If you want to get your work in front of people you will need to learn either to ignore these c
20.
by lunchbucket 5mo ago
> If I had to revise me opinion, I guess I'd say I now no longer believe you didn't read the paper, but instead that you don't know HOW to read scientific papers. This is the kind of opinion you ought to keep to yourself,
21.
by lunchbucket 5mo ago
Now that they've confirmed that was in fact what they meant, how have your views on this exchange changed?
22.
by lunchbucket 5mo ago
Their meaning is very clear to me ("It's not good to be alone, for example one time I was in a lot of danger and a friend helped me").
23.
by lunchbucket 6mo ago
No, consent was assumed . He makes it very clear that he doesn't ask for consent. "I don't even wait." "You can do anything." We don't even need to speculate about what he meant; he assaulted E. Jean Carr
24.
by lunchbucket 6mo ago
You've made a serious and personal insult; what do you think commenting like that says about you?