luisobo

7 ms·

1.
How to Recalculate a Spreadsheet(lord.io)
1 points by luisobo 5y ago|0 comments
2.
Welcome to the YOLO Economy(nytimes.com)
1 points by luisobo 5y ago|1 comments
3.
by luisobo 6y ago
Apple: we are listening
4.
by luisobo 6y ago
I thought it was about improving terminal prompts with a new space daemon. Do we need help?
5.
Google will not renew Pentagon contract that upset employees(mobile.nytimes.com)
11 points by luisobo 8y ago|3 comments
6.
by luisobo 9y ago
The track needs more cowbell. It’s weird to see no cellphones.
7.
Universal Paperclips(decisionproblem.com)
3 points by luisobo 9y ago|0 comments
8.
by luisobo 9y ago
There are many things that we do or could do to make the ssential complexity more manageable. Something that we do already is abstract away parts of the essential complexity (CRUD, entities, validations, etc) where you have DSLs to specify
9.
The Swift Compiler's Build System(modocache.io)
2 points by luisobo 9y ago|0 comments
10.
The Koka Book: An Introduction and Specification of the Koka Language(koka-lang.github.io)
1 points by luisobo 9y ago|0 comments
11.
PLRelational: Observing Change(plausible.coop)
2 points by luisobo 9y ago|0 comments
12.
Wadler's Expression Problem (1998)(homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk)
1 points by luisobo 9y ago|0 comments
13.
by luisobo 9y ago
Explicit vs implicit is a false dichotomy, or at least, an artificial one. With Projectional Editors you can have either one depending on your needs.
14.
by luisobo 10y ago
Offboarding
15.
How Trump's Tax Changes Will Impact You(howmuch.net)
3 points by luisobo 10y ago|0 comments
16.
by luisobo 11y ago
And of course, since it doesn't make sense to you, it is impossible. Turns out that people invented their own language by talking to each other.
17.
by luisobo 11y ago
hi, author here. Thanks for your comment. Personally, I don't think we could reinvent programming and make it 100% future proof. But if we reinvented programming it will be much more future proof that what we have now. The reason is th
18.
by luisobo 11y ago
author here. Thanks for your point. You hit the spot. Yes, who is it to say that we reinvent programming tomorrow and it useless by next week. Great point. My answer is, don't look at it from a black and white perspective. I'm not
19.
by luisobo 11y ago
author here. Thanks for your thoughtful comment. > [meta] The title of this article sucks, really, it's a bait, It was not intended. The title just tries to summarize the post. Still, so much to learn about writing! >> Lots of
20.
by luisobo 11y ago
author here. Thanks for your comment. > Of course, not true, Babbage had to care reference? In any case, the main point is that he was making tradeoffs for his math machine, not for modern software development. Not blaming him, just poin
21.
by luisobo 11y ago
author here. Thanks for your thought, I love it.
22.
by luisobo 11y ago
Hi, author here. Thanks for your comment. >>The computer shifted the complexity of our solutions from the world of atoms to the world of ideas. >And that's fucking awesome! Thanks everyone that was part in making that a realit
23.
by luisobo 11y ago
Author here. Thanks for the discussion. UML didn't pick up for whatever reason and visual programming fell into the valley of deception. I expect that with more UI/UX research we can get to the plateau of productivity in the next
24.
by luisobo 11y ago
author here. Thanks for the comments! Visual programming could be very well an alternative. Or fucking oculus vr or god knows why. I 100% agree with rl3, it proposes a very interesting and challenging problems for the UI/UX folks.
25.
by luisobo 11y ago
author here. Thanks for your comment. I clarified that "Sometimes" the causes are political, it used to say "Usually". But if after a 30 minute read you picked up on a stupid example and you started a discussion on XML v
26.
by luisobo 11y ago
author here. Thanks for you comment! A usual misconception, my fault, is to think I'm complaining about our profession. I'm not, I'm talking about programming, the tool. Re: I love programming. Me too! but I think tools shoul
27.
by luisobo 11y ago
> Agree. Let the author put his money where his mouth is first, then we can discuss where he's right. I am.
28.
by luisobo 11y ago
If everyone followed that argument we would've missed so many interesting things, Facebook for instance. Time can create a better context for an idea to develop. Or maybe the people attempting to implement it the nth time are not idiot
29.
The Future Programming Manifesto(alarmingdevelopment.org)
1 points by luisobo 11y ago|0 comments
30.
by luisobo 12y ago
that's a flaw in the design of a particular the game and not a flaw of gamification itself. What if you could only be rewarded by doing things properly? By trying to affect the outcome of the game you will be improving how you do thing

More ›