lucd

9 ms·

1.
by lucd 2mo ago
The worst about the SpaceX IPO is Nasdaq changing their inclusion rules for the Nasdaq 100. The index fast-tracked SpaceX stock for inclusion 15 days after the IPO, instead of the normal three-month seasoning period. They also changed its
2.
by lucd 2y ago
Kind of ironic reading this and then finding https://github.com/customer-stories/nytimes , huh? Wonder how GitHub wasn't able to detect a single token downloading the entire organization's worth of repositorie
3.
by lucd 4y ago
"Persons who received the BA.5-containing bivalent booster had better neutralizing activity against all Omicron subvariants (especially against BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1 and XBB) than those who received 1 or 2 monovalent [original] boosters&qu
4.
by lucd 4y ago
I'm not sure I understand you.. Do you deplore that Sinovac and Sputnik aren't available in Australia? Really?
5.
by lucd 4y ago
Only purpose of this kind of initiative is to cause trouble.. Marketed by the same trolls who spread medical disinfo, climate negationism, Russian propaganda..
6.
by lucd 4y ago
What eliminates social cohesion and trust is * the disease itself * the people instrumentalizing the disease and/or the sanitary measures to partisan ends..
7.
by lucd 5y ago
If there was such obvious nefarious and severe effects, pharmacovigilance would have seen it. Malone is one of the worst disinformer https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/robert-m...
8.
by lucd 5y ago
The vaccine antigen is only a small part of the virus. Furthermore is was modified and is inert. https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/vaccines/tiny-tweak-behi... Because of international pharmacovigilance we know t
9.
by lucd 5y ago
Not peer reviewed, not published, anonymous authors. This is a fake meta-analysis. The most important study that weighted in IVM favor was bogus and was retracted some days ago.
10.
by lucd 5y ago
Nowhere in the paper I read that ADE was detected in the vaccined. Vaccine-induced ADE is only evocated as a possibility. That's a letter to the editor.. That's an expert opinion and sits at the bottom of the hierachy of scientifi
11.
by lucd 5y ago
Tess Lawrie co-wrote a meta-analysis that was crowd-funded, on the premises that ivermectin is working against covid.. That doesn't bode well for its neutrality, does it ? https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-us-get-lif
12.
by lucd 5y ago
Tess Lawrie ? The same Tess Lawrie who wrote a fraudulent pharmacovigilance analysis claiming that covid vaccines are unsafe, based on the arbitrary claim that anything bad happening to vaccinated people can only be caused by the vaccine. A
13.
by lucd 5y ago
Insufficient scientific data, no rationale After chloroquine, same kind of fallacies are used to push ivermectine.. "Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures. However, pharmacokinetic and phar
14.
by lucd 6y ago
Here is some chart showing vaccination effect on hospitalization for severe forms. Very telling. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/israel-severe-hospitaliza...
15.
by lucd 6y ago
The 94% effectiveness isonly reached one week after the second shot. Only 27% got the two shots. Also Israël recently got the UK strain which is far more transmissible.
16.
by lucd 6y ago
*NeXT computer
17.
by lucd 6y ago
Where was Simone Gold fired from? If you look at her LinkedIn profile she is working as a concierge physician for 9 years, she worked as a congressional fellow.. never worked as an emergency physician. Claiming to have been fired is part of
18.
by lucd 6y ago
Healthier as less comorbidites..
19.
by lucd 6y ago
At least five peer-reviewed RCTs were published, more are on their way..Each of them negative. Science was done.
20.
by lucd 6y ago
"scientists express doubts about coronavirus treatment touted as breakthough by Trump " What is the problem with this Washington Post headlines? Didn't scientists express doubts about this treatment? Didn't Trump didn&#
21.
by lucd 6y ago
Both-sidism: in evidence-based medecine, a treatment is ineffective until it is proven effective. Now that some monthes have passed, at least five peer-reviewed RCTs were conducted. In each of them hydroxychloroquine is ineffective.
22.
by lucd 6y ago
Please tell me who are the authors of the website you mentioned and tell me what is the methodology they used for selecting the studies and rating them.
23.
by lucd 6y ago
A subgroup analysis by self-reported zinc usage was done in the post-exposure prophylaxis RCT . No effect. https://twitter.com/methodsmanmd/status/1293350242310590464
24.
by lucd 6y ago
Yes mean difference −4.5 days,with a low certainty.. They also say: Hydroxychloroquine might increase the risk of adverse events compared with the other interventions And no evidence for reduction in death, except for glucocorticoids.. I w
25.
by lucd 6y ago
Medical misinformation : Malaria is caused by a parasite, not a virus. For Lupus or RA hydroxychloroquine helps through its anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties.
26.
by lucd 6y ago
No methodology, anonymous authors, no peer-reviewing, related to the account @covidanalysis, which is known to push pro-hcq propaganda.. Are you kidding? Why should we waste time with this propaganda piece while there are real scientific pa
27.
by lucd 6y ago
You personal experience, despite being very important to you, isn't significative as scientific proof. The site you mentioned is anonymous, a collection of links with arbitrary ratings. This isn't a scientific paper, this is mark
28.
by lucd 6y ago
Group treated with HCQ much younger and healthier..Study published in a paper were the editor-in-chief works for Raoult Institute..more of less self-publishing.. This is an obversational retrospective study.. Hydroxychloroquine is ineffecti
29.
by lucd 6y ago
This is a collection of links with arbitrary ratings from anonymous authors. A propaganda piece. Here is a real meta-analysis.. https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m2980
30.
by lucd 6y ago
What's next? A fruit name?

More ›