ltdanimal

5 ms·

1.
by ltdanimal 1y ago
Maybe we should agree that all jobs can't be compared apples to apples. I have 3 good friends that fly for major airlines. I'm pretty familiar with the jobs. -Those tests are no joke, but saying they are more intense than a 4 year
2.
by ltdanimal 2y ago
I always look for how this is measured and evaluated when quotes like this are thrown out ... I never am successful.
3.
by ltdanimal 2y ago
The Twitter example is the exact nearsighted reason a lot of comments like the one we're all talking about come up. A lot of smart people spent years trying to make a resilient system and then everyone claims they aren't needed wh
4.
by ltdanimal 3y ago
Looking at all the packages available, I'm sure that's why. You make it a much simpler thing to just develop that runtime for a known environment that you control vs a browser/local that requires a lot more engineering effort
5.
by ltdanimal 3y ago
Except he isn't hesitant about the AI that is beneficial to him and his company. It doesn't make him wrong but it does make him a bit hypocritical.
6.
by ltdanimal 4y ago
You can just reference your separate python file, you don't actually have to put it all in one html file.
7.
by ltdanimal 4y ago
There are a huge number of people who would disagree with Python being a "crap" language, and the irony is that the only language supported in the browser is js. You're missing a big reason Python is popular, and it is anothe
8.
by ltdanimal 8y ago
Exactly. They still are one of THE companies to work for, and throw so much money at people its hard to say no
9.
by ltdanimal 8y ago
I feel like you just contradicted yourself. If a company didn't think innovation lead to more profits, then they wouldn't try to.
10.
by ltdanimal 8y ago
How exactly could you evaluate FizzBuzz over the phone? Its designed as a weed out question early on, if they can't do that (and yes some have failed) then it makes a decision pretty easy
11.
by ltdanimal 8y ago
I think you have that flipped. 20% of code covers 80%. As you try to get to 100% coverage of all possible scenarios the complexity gets in some cases exponentially harder as all the low hanging fruit is picked
12.
by ltdanimal 8y ago
Ha. Pretty weak attach. The dude literally sleeps at work at times, and his companies have produced things that have never been done before. Stuff that you can't really do as a weekend warrior, like rockets and the fastest/longes
13.
by ltdanimal 9y ago
What coastal cities are 2100 miles away? Maybe for few that are retired, but 210 isn't the best for trips that far, and that's assuming the chargers are exactly at where you need them to be
14.
by ltdanimal 9y ago
Seems there are a huge number of people who disagree. There literally being nothing else that does what it does I think is a big leg up.
15.
by ltdanimal 9y ago
Have they? I dont remember ever seeing that. Just that there will only be one screen, and everyone assumed all info would be there.
16.
by ltdanimal 9y ago
I feel that's a cop-out. A fully self-driving world is easily 5 years away, and even then why would I not want relevant info in front of me?
17.
by ltdanimal 9y ago
I disagree. While there may be some that are holding off, they will know the specs in the next couple of months. At that time those people will be queued up and either buy the S,X or the 3, and totals sales wont be impacted at all
18.
by ltdanimal 9y ago
This falls apart pretty quickly when you think about the fact that the government would be forcing someone to sell something they own
19.
by ltdanimal 10y ago
I mean prices are going to be a little inflated over 15 years. Also you can get an incredible vehicle for $15 grand that is a few years old. Those safety requirements are something people (especially with families) are thankful for when the
20.
by ltdanimal 10y ago
I think "360,000 hours" makes it a little more impactful. Was thinking 20 before I clicked the article