ltbarcly

8 ms·

1.
by ltbarcly 18y ago
'spiritual but not religious' is the most vapid phrase ever to originate on the lips of a douchebag.
2.
by ltbarcly 18y ago
It is well documented that the level of religious intensity is very dramatically inversely proportional to education, as well as IQ and income level.
3.
by ltbarcly 18y ago
... I really don't understand why folks act that way. They act that way because when 2 people disagree, and there is absolutely no way to determine who is right, the only way to convince the other person is to coerce them. If I say "Sant
4.
by ltbarcly 18y ago
Oh, you do have a logical defense then? Or are you just spitting into the wind and claiming that "there could be a logical defense, so we shouldn't say there isn't?
5.
by ltbarcly 18y ago
Ok, you're confused here. Something can be an outrage, and something can cause outrage. The question "where's the outrage?" isn't "Where's waldo, see if you can spot an outrage", rather "why aren't people outraged!?". Also, when the FDIC
6.
by ltbarcly 18y ago
Incrementing a pointer is an op. Doing it in a loop takes O(N) time, doing it in a nested loop takes O(N^2) time. These are the timings the author of the article considered terrible for heap allocation. If you have to trace through some
7.
by ltbarcly 18y ago
Questions like this are really questions about words. Was the Roman Empire too big to fail? Sortof, in that it so thoroughly changed how people thought and lived that even 2000 years later we are very obviously Roman in many of our laws, h
8.
by ltbarcly 18y ago
This essay is bullshit, the author doesn't understand anything he is talking about to the point of absurdity (allocating objects on the stack takes 0 time???) and he largely repeats the common-knowledge on slashdot, as geniuses like this ar
9.
by ltbarcly 18y ago
People need to be told when to be outraged. Most people, including the majority of people reading these words, don't understand how the banking system works, even on a simple level, or how stock exchanges work, on a basic level, or how the
10.
by ltbarcly 18y ago
Random walk down Wall Street, then the Graham books (look for things that are written by the people who taught Warren Buffet).
11.
by ltbarcly 18y ago
Yea, I think this article is just flaunted stupidity. The author assumes that all times where any user information is needed, that all the information about that user will be needed. That is silly. Secondly, they completely ignores th
12.
by ltbarcly 18y ago
Why would I want to see this site? There is absolutely no point to viewing it, and therefore why would I pay to put something on it? Also, how could this possibly take more than 3 hours to make?
13.
by ltbarcly 18y ago
This is a bad idea for a startup. Anyone can run 'strings' on a flash file and index it. And your website isn't very good either. So all in all, I would say you should spend your time doing something that would take more than 20 minutes
14.
by ltbarcly 19y ago
What about arc makes anyone think it can scale? Is there an example of a continuations based web server that can?
15.
by ltbarcly 19y ago
A combination should work well enough. 1. Obviously allow password resets to on file email addresses. 2. If the above fails, try geocoding the address with google or geocode.us. If it successfully geocodes, ask the user for the address use
16.
by ltbarcly 19y ago
I guess you never heard the one about premature optimization? And who in their right mind 'splices in native code' to java? You sound like you learned how to program from reading slashdot.