lsseckman

7 ms·

1.
by lsseckman 5y ago
thank you!
2.
by lsseckman 6y ago
[2017]
3.
by lsseckman 8y ago
> And why do many ordinary Americans experience such outrage on behalf of these multinationals These are companies we all helped build in one way or another. Their revenues boost our economy and pay for a lot of our govt services
4.
by lsseckman 8y ago
you *could do recurring payments on Ethereum
5.
by lsseckman 9y ago
Hearst did this, was some outcry about it
6.
by lsseckman 9y ago
thaaaaaaank you
7.
by lsseckman 9y ago
right, but the point is that those products won't maintain the company valuation. lots of people have heard about AIM, but it didn't save AOL
8.
by lsseckman 9y ago
If Google's asset was so powerful you'd think their other products would be doing better. (google+, glass, Allo, etc)
9.
by lsseckman 9y ago
hey do you have any more info about this? have been wanting to do something similar.
10.
by lsseckman 9y ago
Price wouldn’t drop unless you actually sold.
11.
by lsseckman 9y ago
Are you aware of the book The Circle?
12.
by lsseckman 9y ago
if you're taking 2009 as a reference point, you have to wonder whether Bitcoin is the CDO market, or the banks investing in those markets. Both failed, only one was bailed out.
13.
by lsseckman 9y ago
That's more of what I would expect! Does that make it feel more like he was intentionally storing company files in a personal account?
14.
by lsseckman 9y ago
"He [Lewandowski] also said it was common practice to share work files via Dropbox" Always interesting seeing company employees not using their company's products. Shows that what some view as a monolith is a bunch of smaller
15.
by lsseckman 9y ago
oh, the script just executes a buying strategy that avoids short term fluctuations. It's not a profit-making strategy.
16.
by lsseckman 9y ago
Are you actually sending that amount around?
17.
by lsseckman 9y ago
http://www.baidu.com/ https://www.google.com/
18.
by lsseckman 9y ago
I like this, I'm using it. I'll contribute that this is a good way to explain to someone why corporations inherently care about their employees only to the extent of their usefulness.
19.
by lsseckman 9y ago
this is a great point. And given market caps I doubt there are any sizeable funds invested, which may point to no bubble at all.
20.
by lsseckman 9y ago
> The logical conclusion to that would be that everyone wants to be an employee and nobody wants to be an employer. This is interesting. Let's say there is a a r=g, to r is slightly less than g world. Then people would try to maximi
21.
by lsseckman 9y ago
Don't know of any public, this is an interesting list of private (you're likely already aware of) https://baremetrics.com/open In working with public company CFO's, I would guess 50% of the time & effort
22.
by lsseckman 9y ago
it was only after your comment that I'm noticing: talking, listening, understanding, seeing and remembering. I wonder if we're just too focused on doing things that people do.
23.
by lsseckman 10y ago
Ahh interesting. I like the subscription model from the perspective of the business. Seems like it would prohibit signing up for the low-volume user though, right?
24.
by lsseckman 10y ago
This is a really good example of the pitfalls here. All the way down to the micro-level decision influences.
25.
by lsseckman 10y ago
Seems sails for ships this size would either be unwieldy in port, too little volume for much impact in locomotion, or too costly to maintain.
26.
by lsseckman 10y ago
Wish they had gone into more detail on this. It seems like a solid competitive advantage for the owners to offer lower fuel consumption & therefore a cheaper charter. Easy. Anyone know if there are similar upgrades that can be applied t
27.
by lsseckman 10y ago
We'd be interested in that cost comparison!
28.
by lsseckman 10y ago
That's not the point here though, is it
29.
by lsseckman 10y ago
.
30.
by lsseckman 10y ago
Point C being really important. Lose a lot of credibility if you lose your cool while doing that.

More ›