Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lsparrish
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
lsparrish
5y ago
It's just a bunch of automated drones flying in formation. Trying to calculate their orbits ahead of time in any kind of detail would be a fool's errand, instead we'd just use solar light pressure to steer them as needed (the
2.
▲
by
lsparrish
8y ago
Nobody is making use of this service yet. However, if they were, why would it be ghastly for them to voluntarily trade a small number of days worth of terminal decline for a substantially better quality preservation and thus correspondingly
3.
▲
by
lsparrish
10y ago
I'm not sure why people seem so convinced that MNT is a hard requirement here. To be sure there are some components that require fine micrometer to nanometer level precision, but existing mechanical and/or chemical approaches do w
4.
▲
by
lsparrish
10y ago
You might find this interesting: http://gravitationalballoon.blogspot.com/2013/03/introductio...
5.
▲
by
lsparrish
11y ago
> Aldehydes covalently bond and crosslink the proteins and irreversibly kill all of the fixed cells. That is the textbook answer, however these bonds are only "irreversible" as a matter of biochemistry. You can actually break a
6.
▲
by
lsparrish
11y ago
This technique is useful for general neuroscience purposes, yes. My point was just that it isn't what is critical to preserve for the sake of cryonics.
7.
▲
by
lsparrish
11y ago
> The bag with the remains of the watches gets carefully pocketed and some of the money goes towards ordering a round of drinks for everybody. I might have misunderstood this bit (in which case, oops). I see way too many people making th
8.
▲
by
lsparrish
11y ago
His criticism bad (as ever), since he assumes all information needed for nervous system function is the same as all information needed to replicate a given nervous system. Most of the information needed for function in any system is generic
9.
▲
by
lsparrish
11y ago
Cool story, bro. Cryonics as it currently exists being profitable is 1) irrelevant to whether it works or not, and 2) a persistent myth.
10.
▲
by
lsparrish
12y ago
I should also mention that the wood frog is really more a counterexample of vitrification. It forms ice (which they are adapted to tolerate, unlike us), but the interior or the cells remains a slightly more concentrated liquid. It is nowh
11.
▲
by
lsparrish
12y ago
It's interesting that the comments by cell biologist Len Ornstein in that thread completely omit any mention of high osmolality vitrification, which is what is practiced in cryonics. I get the impression he is not aware of Fahy's
12.
▲
by
lsparrish
12y ago
Um. You also stop poverty and wars. That is also your duty.
13.
▲
Bitcoin Is Already Making A Big Comeback
(businessinsider.com)
2 points
by
lsparrish
13y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
Can bitcoin rescue cryonics from obscurity?
(lesswrong.com)
1 points
by
lsparrish
13y ago
|
0 comments
15.
▲
MtGox explains price drop
(mtgox.com)
2 points
by
lsparrish
13y ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
by
lsparrish
13y ago
Not at all what was said. In fact, the whole criticism you linked to is about structure, and ways in which it is supposedly altered beyond repair. The notion that we are transient electric fields that fade the moment the brainwave goes flat
17.
▲
by
lsparrish
13y ago
If you think the pursuit of immortality causes mental breakdowns, can you substantiate this with evidence from psychology journals? If not, this strikes me as unreliable folk wisdom. There is a lot of possible change that does not involve d
18.
▲
by
lsparrish
13y ago
My gut estimate is that the chance is somewhere in the 1-10% range. I've been thinking about it for around 5 years. Part of why that number is so high is the relative lack of coherent and nuanced counterargument that demonstrates the critic
19.
▲
by
lsparrish
13y ago
Personally, I'm glad to see cryonics being given more attention and discussion. It is a subject not well understood, even among biologists. If you think people undergoing it today are wasting their money (arguable, though I don't concede to
20.
▲
by
lsparrish
13y ago
By all means, please, show us peer reviewed sources that contradict it.
21.
▲
by
lsparrish
13y ago
> Nanobots cannot repair angstrom-scale freeze damages. Vitrification avoids ice. Nanobots could e.g. remove toxic compounds from extracellular areas and replace them with nontoxic solutions, and deliver yet-to-be-invented drugs that wo
22.
▲
by
lsparrish
13y ago
> Understanding "biology 101" means understanding that biology is about experiments, everyth is empirical (and will be for quite some time I guess), nothing can be said that "it works" in biology or medicine until you experimentally pro
23.
▲
by
lsparrish
13y ago
> (since you are dead). IMHO this is the cryo equivalent of an ethnic slur. Cryophobia, if you will. It meets the "you can't change this thing about yourself so we outsiders are going to make fun of you for it, nyah nyah" pattern while
24.
▲
by
lsparrish
13y ago
Isn't this more a question of the relative strength of objective evidence? I have a problem with the idea that hope in and of itself is a bad thing.
25.
▲
by
lsparrish
13y ago
> These beliefs do not seem, at this point in time, differentially stupid or crazy. How did you reach that point of view?
26.
▲
by
lsparrish
13y ago
From what we do know, it's actually very reasonable. We know e.g. that memory survives hypothermic loss of electrical activity. So it is probably structurally based.
27.
▲
by
lsparrish
13y ago
> There is exactly zero evidence that a brain/mind is functional without it's body. My understanding is that head transplants actually have been done in mammals with retention of consciousness. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_transpl
28.
▲
Hacker with terminal illness seeks to opt out of death
(aaronwinborn.com)
11 points
by
lsparrish
14y ago
|
2 comments
29.
▲
by
lsparrish
14y ago
I think that if a cure for aging is invented tomorrow, I won't be able to benefit from it. Why? Because it will still be in clinical trials by the time I die. The simple solution is to pour money (and lots of it) into the goal of clinical
30.
▲
Curing aging will take too long. But there is an alternative.
(plus.google.com)
1 points
by
lsparrish
14y ago
|
0 comments
More ›