lsjvjn

6 ms·

1.
by lsjvjn 5y ago
I mean that physical brain lateralization is not supported by scientific evidence. It doesn't matter because it's only tangential to the ideas expressed in the book.
2.
by lsjvjn 5y ago
Pick up "Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain" and follow the lessons and exercises within. The left/right brain stuff is a little pseudo-sciency, but the basic thesis of the book is sound: contrary to common attitudes, art
3.
by lsjvjn 5y ago
The debate over the limits of acceptable speech on social media is a discussion worth having, but the claim in the article does not match the wording of the policy at hand. The policy states that users will get a strike if they claim that “
4.
by lsjvjn 5y ago
Is the fact that the story is set 20,000 years into the future instead of 10,000 really "necessary"? After discussing the film with friends who have no exposure to the books, I think the constrained scope helped make the film easi
5.
by lsjvjn 5y ago
The biggest problem with the 1984 Dune is that the film becomes overburdened with clunky exposition. I think there was a deliberate decision to avoid that mistake with this adaptation. While, as a fan of the novel, I'd have liked to se
6.
by lsjvjn 5y ago
We've seen many articles over the last few years about the YouTube recommendation rabbit hole radicalizing young people online. Facebook is not blameless, but they've become a scapegoat for issues plaguing an entire industry.
7.
by lsjvjn 5y ago
>The fact that Facebook is uniquely held responsible for the societal problems engendered by the Internet does, I suspect, stem from the fact that Zuckerberg is an obvious target. How many people concerned about anti-vax rhetoric, for ex
8.
by lsjvjn 5y ago
I'd say it's a larger concern for Bridge, since the game is (unfortunately) primarily played only by older folks who are more at-risk.
9.
by lsjvjn 5y ago
The raised camera band is bound to be a controversial design choice.