lpinca

10 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by lpinca 6y ago

   > There is NO WAY in hell the Italians have tested over 200,000 patients for SARS-Cov2 in a matter of 2-3 weeks due to See https://lab24.ilsole24ore.com/coronavirus/#box_6 that graphs shows the number of tampons per
2. 2.▲
   by lpinca 7y ago

   How is this better than https://httpstatuses.com/
3. 3.▲
   by lpinca 9y ago

   I'm not sure how the append only mode works but I tried to run a script (appendfsync directive set to always) which sets a new key in an endless loop and kill the server in the middle of the execution. No changes are written to the AOF
4. 4.▲
   by lpinca 10y ago

   Did you ever try to disable permessage-deflate with ws? It will never be as lightweight as uws because ws is built on top of `net.Socket` but I think you hit this ws issue https://github.com/websockets/ws/issues&#x
5. 5.▲
   by lpinca 10y ago

   It's your idea of transparency which I don't like, not your project.
6. 6.▲
   by lpinca 10y ago

   Yes, for 100k connection, using Alex's own benchmarks I saw that uws is up to 2x faster/more lightweight than ws except for the short message throughput where uws really shines and is up to 10x faster. It is a lot, don't get
7. 7.▲
   by lpinca 10y ago

   For 100k connections your own benchmarks showed a different story. Now I didn't try with 1 million and I guess it gets worse so I trust you but I can try with removing the upgrade request, the event emitter, etc from ws to start at lea
8. 8.▲
   by lpinca 10y ago

   `ws` is another popular WebSocket implementation for Node.js
9. 9.▲
   by lpinca 10y ago

   Congrats for this achievement. For anyone using this in Node.js I strongly suggest to run your own benchmarks as uws is no way 47x 18x 33x and 2x times faster/more lightweight than ws. Also check how the improvements are obtained.
10. 10.▲
    by lpinca 10y ago

    I'm still confused. You are announcing 1.0 but the actual version is 1.1
11. 11.▲
    by lpinca 10y ago

    I'm confused. 1.1 has been released 13 days ago https://github.com/deepstreamIO/deepstream.io/releases/tag/v...
12. 12.▲
    by lpinca 10y ago

    Take a look at https://github.com/primus/primus .
13. 13.▲
    by lpinca 10y ago

    The project is young but looks promising.
14. 14.▲
    by lpinca 10y ago

    I wonder what was the WebSocket module used in Node. There is this new module https://github.com/alexhultman/uWebSockets which is very promising.
15. 15.▲
    by lpinca 11y ago

    This is great.
16. 16.▲
    by lpinca 11y ago

    Location: Perugia Area, Italy Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: It depends on the offer Technologies: JavaScript (Node.js, Primus, Express, jQuery), SQL (MySQL), Redis, MongoDB, PHP, Linux, Bash, Git, CSS, HTML Résumé/CV: W
17. 17.▲
    by lpinca 11y ago

    I won a promo code for a .HOST 85% off from the same anniversary game. I will not use it, so if you are interested let me know.
18. 18.▲
    by lpinca 12y ago

    Maybe a bit out of topic but take a look at this https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome-nodejs and this http://nodeschool.io/
19. 19.▲
    by lpinca 12y ago

    It's nice, but why should i pay for this when i can write a simple bot that runs 24/7 and does the same thing for free? At least add a free plan.
20. 20.▲
    by lpinca 12y ago

    Title updated.
21. 21.▲
    CentOS 7 potential release(seven.centos.org)

    45 points by lpinca 12y ago|55 comments
22. 22.▲
    by lpinca 12y ago

    Yes it does, but if you are building something that works perfectly only using websockets (e.g. a command-line utility), why would you use engine.io? You can tell engine.io to only use websockets, but what's the point if you can use we
23. 23.▲
    by lpinca 12y ago

    You can't use both. In Primus you can select only one transformer, listed above by V1, but if something doesn't work, you can just switch it with a single line of code. No rewrites, no need to learn a new API.
24. 24.▲
    by lpinca 12y ago

    Congrats for the release, but i will keep using https://github.com/primus/primus . No module lock-in! Yes i'm a bit biased.
25. 25.▲
    by lpinca 12y ago

    Silly.
26. 26.▲
    by lpinca 14y ago

    Cool idea!
27. 27.▲
    by lpinca 14y ago

    Yeah, but it's a limitation. Playing a file in another domain works with http://www.schillmania.com/projects/soundmanager2/ or http://www.jplayer.org/ ( http://jsfiddle.net/Q4LMV/18076/ ) https://github.com/CreateJS/SoundJS/ instead r
28. 28.▲
    by lpinca 14y ago

    http://jsfiddle.net/mt6Tt/1/ Value is not of type AudioBuffer. Origin null is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin.
29. 29.▲
    by lpinca 14y ago

    You should add a link to return to the original post then.
30. 30.▲
    Show HN: binb, an open source guess-the-song game(binb.nodejitsu.com)

    3 points by lpinca 14y ago|0 comments