Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lp0_on_fire
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
8d ago
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
2.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
8d ago
> Everyone is tracked, but only certain people are watched. The "only certain people are watched" hinges on pinky swears, winks, and nods. IMO it's a distinction without a difference.
3.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
13d ago
Untrue. It adds a great amount of value to 'ole Zuck's ego.
4.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
20d ago
I say this in jest, but at the rate inflation has been going $16k per year might buy you a hamburger in 10 years.
5.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
2mo ago
Do you use it with multiple cats? I know they advertise it that way but I'm curious where the rubber meets the pavement.
6.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
2mo ago
> feel better about themselves by doing “something”. "The real friends are the clicks and attention you receive along the way."
7.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
2mo ago
Yeah? And what are they going to do about it, exactly? These AI companies have already been caught red handed stealing content to train their models and the courts blessed it. On a scale that would have landed you or I in prison. It’s jus
8.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
5mo ago
> Feels crazy to me for people to use anything other than the best available. Not everyone has unlimited budgets to burn on tokens.
9.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
5mo ago
The Atlantic aligns politically with people who do not align politically with Musk. It’s just red meat for their readers.
10.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
5mo ago
Believe it or not most people don’t like being sold a bill of goods. It’s not our fault these technology companies (and others) have managed to capture the legal system to the point they can redefine words to mean the exact opposite of what
11.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
5mo ago
[flagged]
12.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
5mo ago
Must you people infect _every_ online space with your politics?
13.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
5mo ago
Seems like a way to fast track disappointment, but good luck nevertheless!
14.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
6mo ago
Have you met these AI companies yet?
15.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
6mo ago
Artemis was already set in stone well before DOGE came about and IMO if the federal government is going to set mountains of cash on fire I'd rather it be to NASA than half the crap the government wastes every year.
16.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
6mo ago
It's even more exciting when you realize that the last crewed mission beyond Low Earth Orbit was 1972 and each person on that spacecraft today are younger than that.
17.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
6mo ago
For now. It will be back in a few years more expensive than ever of history is to be believed.
18.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
6mo ago
> Outlook is now basically an Electron app And it's horrible.
19.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
6mo ago
The start menu used to manifest instantly. The right click menu never once showed me “loading…” when I just want to click “properties” A not too overly flashy UI that made efficient use of your screen space. It didn’t used to by default sho
20.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
6mo ago
I don’t disagree that installing windows/macos and certain Linux distros can be stupid easy but to a layman it’s daunting. In my experience most people who use a computing device may be able to tell me “this is window” or “this is Mac”
21.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
6mo ago
I literally just sat through the annual “choose your healthcare” plan bullshit and the “meeting” was literally one of the Hr people pulling up a power point narrated by “AI”. You could tell in the first ten seconds. You’d think our plans w
22.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
7mo ago
“Stochastic parrot dismissals”. There’s that pseudo intellectual navel gazing.
23.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
7mo ago
The “discussion” is pseudo intellectual navel gazing by people who’ve read too much sci fi.
24.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
7mo ago
> but if you aren't closely supervising your AI right now, maybe you ought to be held responsible for what it does after you set it loose. You ought to be held responsible for what it does whether you are closely supervising it or n
25.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
7mo ago
> Or is everyone just pretending for fun judging by the number of people who think we owe explanations to a piece of software or that we should give it any deference I think some of them aren't pretending.
26.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
7mo ago
The point is they DON'T know the full capabilities. They're "moving fast and breaking things".
27.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
7mo ago
Putting aside for a moment that moltbook is a meme and we already know people were instructing their agents to generate silly crap...yes. Running a piece of software _ with the intent_ that it actually attempt/do those things would li
28.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
7mo ago
You've got nothing to worry about. These are machines. Stop. Point blank. Ones and Zeros derived out of some current in a rock. Tools. They are not alive. They may look like they do but they don't "think" and they
29.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
7mo ago
The person operating a tool is responsible for what it does. If I start my lawn mower, tie a rope to it and put a brick on the gas pedal so it mows my lawn while I make dinner and the damned thing ends up running over someone's foot T
30.
▲
by
lp0_on_fire
7mo ago
Whether it was _built_ to be addressed like a person doesn't change the fact that it's _not_ a person and is just a piece of software. A piece of software that is spamming unhelpful and useless comments in a place where _humans_
More ›