lovethyenemy

7 ms·

1.
by lovethyenemy 5y ago
What makes you think censorship ceases to be censorship when it is automated?
2.
by lovethyenemy 5y ago
>What I'm saying is that there's no conclusive proof there's some sort of grand conspiracy at work here. Could you define what you mean by "grand conspiracy"? And what conclusive proof of it would look like?
3.
by lovethyenemy 5y ago
>2) Is there something special about meat computers called brains or your definition of “consciousness” that precludes this? This statement contains so many false assumptions. For starters, there is much more to consciousness than just t
4.
by lovethyenemy 5y ago
>Free speech is a core liberal value. That is true of classical liberals, but not neo liberals.
5.
by lovethyenemy 5y ago
Adding more anecdata: 1. Had covid early 2021, felt like a mild cold for a week, couldn't smell my farts for 3 weeks. No heart issues. 2. 8 months later, got the Pfizer double dose, and had 6 weeks of heart pain and palpitations. Final
6.
by lovethyenemy 5y ago
>Perhaps these are the death throes of a dying propaganda machine? This is my thought as well. Its funny how quickly we've gone from people trying to redefine censorship, i.e.: "it's not censorship if a corporation does it
7.
by lovethyenemy 5y ago
It's just blind speculation. There is absolutely no historical precedent of Big Tech corporations implementing censorship controls at the behest of governments. Anyone claiming otherwise is spreading misinformation and should be censor
8.
by lovethyenemy 5y ago
Guilty until proven innocent is an incompatible maxim for civilised society.
9.
by lovethyenemy 5y ago
>Is there anything, any issue, that doesn't involve large corporations making lots of money? Preventative health practices, especially those utilizing simple, unpatentable, natural tools and techniques.