loverofhumanz

28 ms·

1.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
Man suffered outdoors very much, for a million years. Man want both good of indoors and good of out outdoors.
2.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
> That giving the state security apparatus more tools to arbitrarily harass people at their discretion is a Bad Idea™. Measuring heart rate, using a computer which can log its data, is the exact opposite of arbitrary. It's an object
3.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
Some of the responses to me were rude and I calibrated my responses to them appropriately. You stated I was "missing the point" which is more rude than me sincerely asking you to explain your rationale. Your claims made very littl
4.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
Yes, some people will be stressed and nervous for benign reasons. Criminals will also be stressed and nervous. A good security system will use multiple signals to filter out false-positives.
5.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
Explain how it's worse than a camera or thermal camera that detects you sweating? Explain how it increases the incentive to do body cavity searches?
6.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
> Today you’re among the people to avoid searching; tomorrow, well… maybe you’ll have a reason to be nervous. What do you even mean here? Seems entirely incoherent.
7.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
> Please supply your dna and biometrics at every entry point of a public roadways. Thank you good citizen. Hysterical slipper slope nonsense. Using RF to passively detect someone's heart rate at close range is objectively less intru
8.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
"Of course there would be many false positives, so it wouldn't be good enough on its own."
9.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
"Of course there would be many false positives, so it wouldn't be good enough on its own."
10.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
> Oh good lord. Now it's no longer even "have you read a history book on the 20th century?" anymore, it's "have you been paying attention to the world for the past 15 years?". Spare me the hysterics and the
11.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
Doesn't seem like a reasonable objection to me. It takes a lot of time and man power to search people's body cavities. The incentive is to avoid searching as many people as possible.
12.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
Wifi seems much more capable and harder to defeat? A heavy coat could defeat mmWave, I believe.
13.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
What's the objection? I don't see how having my heart rate scanned at an airport or military checkpoint in any way impinges on my freedom or happiness.
14.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
It could be used to scan people's heart rates when they're in a high security line (military check points, airports, embassies) to detect people who are nervous. I assume some places already use thermal cameras to detect people wh
15.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
I used the AI, the web, and even tried to verify with full page scans but then I realized I have a job.
16.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
In the oldest reliable references from the 1920s, it was a $2 bill, $1 bill, a watch, and a dime. So keys and contacts are both modern revisions.
17.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
Depends largely on the altitude when fuel runs out. If it runs out when they're at 4,000 ft and it's windy, it's probably game over.
18.
by loverofhumanz 11mo ago
"I’m a little confused by what there is to investigate at all." You're confused why they should investigate how everyone on that flight came within minutes of dying? Something about the fuel reserves, procedures, or executi
19.
by loverofhumanz 1y ago
They've almost all already doubled down and opened R&D offices abroad. They will do absolutely whatever helps them maximize profits. There are no ethics to it. American companies shouldn't be able to bribe American politicians
20.
by loverofhumanz 1y ago
"If a company can't find someone for a specific job or role then I don't care if they go abroad to find that person." You're believing and repeating the propaganda. The H1B was sold to Americans as for this purpos