lovelearning

7 ms·

1.
by lovelearning 14d ago
Good that I saw this. The VSCode Antigravity extension I was using turns out to be a 3rd-party one. I found out only today that there's an official extension too, which I think wasn't there earlier.
2.
by lovelearning 2mo ago
I'm amazed that in ~450 comments, the word "capitalism" is mentioned in just one - yours - and you've been downvoted for criticizing it! It seems even a group that purports to be rational critical thinkers don't wan
3.
Gemini Interactions API(ai.google.dev)
3 points by lovelearning 2mo ago|0 comments
4.
We Uncovered the Master Plan That Peter Thiel Doesn't Want You to See(youtube.com)
3 points by lovelearning 2mo ago|0 comments
5.
by lovelearning 3mo ago
I agree with you. "True" has a connotation of absoluteness and finality. But I doubt humanity can ever know what is "true" about the universe. We can only model its phenomena with better theories, where "better&quot
6.
by lovelearning 3mo ago
> If a party today advocated just rolling back to those policies verbatim, they would be called Nazis immediately. This seems to imply a social ideology rather than a geostrategic one. The term "Nazi" is used for a specific bra
7.
by lovelearning 3mo ago
IMO, neither the UK not the US went to war over moral objections to Nazi or other imperialist ideologies. They themselves were imperialists. They went to war to fight Germany's, Japan's, and Russia's attempts at geostrategic
8.
by lovelearning 4mo ago
Your expectations are unrealistic. Every type of content will have some restrictions. Structural, ideological, financial. Just about every type of written content on a platform has word limits imposed by its editors. Word limits restrict ho
9.
by lovelearning 4mo ago
> I know nothing about Atlantic currents or this particular monitoring project That's the problem. > This article failed on any level to help me make an informed decision. You shouldn't rely on just one article to make an &
10.
by lovelearning 4mo ago
> Wait, is everyone who posts on who wants to be hired a sad down-and-out unemployed waif at the end of their rope? That should be the assumption in an ethical society. Especially given the current economic context. Veil of ignorance pri
11.
by lovelearning 4mo ago
What are those other tools?
12.
by lovelearning 4mo ago
It's not "apologetic" and it wasn't meant to convince you but to refute your pointless pedantic nitpicking for other readers.
13.
by lovelearning 4mo ago
Very funny. However, your analogy is not equivalent to, nor an example for, what I said. There's a difference between a phone's own USB/audiojack interfaces and a wall outlet.
14.
by lovelearning 4mo ago
I don't see it as clickbait since the realities of the Android ecosystem is a shared context. Most people know that just about every Android phone has a restricted hardware design, not an expandable one. So, "turn your phone into
15.
by lovelearning 5mo ago
The post's recommendations and analogies kind of go against two shortcut approaches that have helped a lot of people in the pre-AI real world: 1) perfect is the enemy of good 2) fake it till you make it The analogies imagine difficult
16.
by lovelearning 5mo ago
I find the coordination between nations suspicious. But what you said - "It's also because social media is part of the USA's soft power projection, and many of us now consider this to be a threat." - strikes me as the mo
17.
by lovelearning 5mo ago
> Nobody uses it. It will not be missed. Well, I happen to use it everyday. I honestly don't know what exactly is "terrible/horrible/awful" about it. I'm neutral about its UX - neither memorable nor despicab
18.
by lovelearning 6mo ago
My understanding is that the synthetic training data helps capture abstract time-series patterns that are common in all domains. As they say in appendix 8: > We create the synthetic data to reflect common time-series patterns using tradi
19.
by lovelearning 6mo ago
I thought the title meant the training data used was ethics content and ethical reasoning. Turns out "ethically trained" means the training data used doesn't violate copyright laws.
20.
by lovelearning 6mo ago
> these tools until AI had the common property of being enhancing of human cognition, because they couldn't do the thinking for you I have a different take, centered around this idea: Not everyone was into thinking about everything
21.
by lovelearning 6mo ago
Your comment mistakenly assumes this is the only campaign around. But this is just one among many initiatives and websites. There are campaigns against other US big tech companies on this site itself: - https://action.wemove.eu&#
22.
by lovelearning 6mo ago
To me, the assumptions in your comment about them and their views seem much more like stories of your own creation, likely without any empirical testing of the reality around you.
23.
by lovelearning 6mo ago
Couldn't this antichrist stuff be his sane/rational strategy to manipulate the powerful but religious rightwing people under his sway? Is there evidence to assume he himself is on the verge of some kind of psychosis and not fully
24.
by lovelearning 6mo ago
HN isn't showing me a reply option for your latest comment, so I'll reply here instead. Just to clarify, I used plain Google search not Google AI mode. And opened search results which seemed "reputable," without knowing
25.
by lovelearning 6mo ago
> Burn more tokens on this one Needless condescension and wrong assumption. No wonder so many people and students nowadays prefer answers (and even counseling) from LLMs instead of other people. > but the absence of an editor or peer
26.
by lovelearning 6mo ago
Gemini (currently) gave this reasonable and unbiased answer that challenges both pro-US/Israeli and pro-Iranian biases. It's also a good point for the OP - when selecting an LLM, ask the people they're dealing with to ask 2-3
27.
by lovelearning 6mo ago
Even as a human, I find whatever sources Google shows to be inconsistent. I can't give any confident answer about the number of fingers. I think the answer is actually "4 sometimes and 5 other times." So I'm not sure how
28.
by lovelearning 6mo ago
The nature of the source, whether primary or secondary or tertiary, does not automatically imply anything about their biases. Even a primary research paper on a novel topic may be biased or wrong. I agree that LLMs can't collect real w
29.
by lovelearning 6mo ago
The mere fact that editing is applied to newspapers, documentaries, or Wikipedia does not imply they become closer to the objective truth or free of omissions after the edits. Indeed, the edits may go the other way to align with vested busi
30.
by lovelearning 6mo ago
> automatically generated data graphs Are you saying there are data graphs that don't have humans in the chain? If so, what came up with the data and the tools to generate those graphs? And how do you decide which data and graph to

More ›