loveistheanswer

3 ms·

1.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>Why 5 years? Why not 1? Why not 50? What's so special to people about 5 years? Clinical trials are conducted over many years (rather than just 1) for historical safety reasons[1] >There is a faction of fools out there who resist
2.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
This is an interview with the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology. Youtube censored the full interview, but you can view it here: https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f/how-to-save-the-world%2C... Edit: a quote from the &
3.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Its a great example of how blinding ideology and partisan politics is. For people who did not have their identity tied to either political side, the lab leak theory was always an obvious possibility.
4.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>You write this as if NIH is a privately run foundation with Fauci at the head. He's not even head of the NIH He has been the head of the NIAID, the infectious diseases arm of the NIH, for ~37 years.
5.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>“If you ban gain-of-function research, you ban all of virology.” This is an absurd strawman. If it were true, why have there been so many virologists calling GoF unethical and seeking to prohibit it?
6.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Because we're talking about research of biological weapons of mass destruction.
7.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
From Fauci's paper: >In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? Many ask reasonable questions: given the poss
8.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
The people who judge and define others primarily by the color of their skin rather than the content of their character. Those who fight racism with racism and call it anti-racism or reverse-racism. Those who use hate, blame, and punishment
9.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>Growing to overcome past problems is not sufficient. Their assumption is moreso that we cant grow to overcome past problems. So the only way to build themselves up is to tear others down. Thats why the popular "anti-racism"
10.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>Why do people feel the need to socially shame people publicly for an offense over a decade ago? Because they're playing a game of Moral Supremacy one-upsmanship. In the long run, everyone who plays this game must lose, because were
11.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Can you quote where exactly they are "conflating the state of Israel and Jewish people and lumping it all together."? >Plenty of Jewish people that live both inside and outside of Israel are critical of the state. Is this not e
12.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>The main avenue would be by getting rid of the sanctioned on/off ramps for crypto (that is, crypto exchanges), leaving only the illegal on/off ramps which I'm sure exist. From what I've read it seems its only the stu
13.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
What is "biased" about calling dual use technologies such as artificially enhanced viruses weapons of mass destruction? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual-use_technology#Biologic...
14.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
What is?
15.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
The politically correct term that the editorial is advocating for is gain of function research. Here's a quote from one of the referenced NIH studies in the editorial which makes it plain: >"laboratory experiments that resulted
16.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>"despite some crazy people in this world" Is making biological weapons of mass destruction crazy? Fauci does not think so. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-flu-virus-risk-wor...
17.
Amazon Won't Screen Employees for Marijuana Use, Will Back Federal Legalization(newsweek.com)
3 points by loveistheanswer 5y ago|0 comments
18.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>the old trope about doing LSD and then spending a day trying not to jump out a window doesn't come from nowhere. It seems that "old trope" actually came from the CIA's MKULTRA project where they were secretly dosing
19.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>Epistemologically, this is where we are as a country: when content gets expurgated because of blatant misinformation, it is taken as a sure sign of that source’s truthfulness. Its funny how oblivious pro-censorship people are to the nat
20.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
In what ways is the technology itself, rather than how it may often be used, a scam?
21.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
How would you know if your political party was trying to score political points? What specific criteria would have to be met?
22.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Thats not how science works. 1. First you make a hypothesis. 2. Then you gather data. If people arent allowed to make hypotheses or gather data around hypotheses, we can't do the scientific method.
23.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Do you have any sources for long term mRNA vaccine trials on humans? My searches seem to indicate there are none, other than the preliminary, limited scope short term trials
24.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
It almost seems like a lot of people don't want the data to indicate that natural immunity is strong and long lasting, even though the data shows that reinfection is extemely rare. Similar to how so many people have been unwilling to
25.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Control: the power to influence or direct people's behavior or the course of events. You don't think communication influences or directs people's behavior?
26.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Thats a good point. We'd need to compare the number of confirmed reinfections divided by confirmed infections with the number of breakthrough cases divided by the number of fully vaccinated people. Its also worth noting the confirmed r
27.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>Does the US not differentiate between those who have had it and those that didn't? No they do not. Public messaging has completely ignored natural immunity.
28.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>We are at the tail end of this thing _because_ we have a vaccination available. Are you implying naturally gained immunity does not play a role in herd immunity? Is there any data which supports this hypothesis?
29.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
>There are multiple documented cases where a person caught COVID twice There have been far more breakthrough cases of fully vaccinated people than there have been confirmed reinfections.
30.
by loveistheanswer 5y ago
Stalin would have killed to have the powerful tools that Zuckerberg has. Stalin only had control over the speech and thoughts of around one hundred million people in one country. Zuckerberg has control over the speech and thoughts of around

More ›