lordsper

5 ms·

1.
by lordsper 11y ago
I take it you mean they don't want you to work there?
2.
by lordsper 11y ago
Or it means: you value your equity at $0 a year, and your HR guys get a bonus for reducing expenses.
3.
by lordsper 11y ago
Yeah, but the adblockers will win in the end. Worst case: we lose all bandwidth winnings, and have to simulate functioning ads to content distributors. P.S.: NoScript blocks the Javascript warning for me, unless I allow the bild.de domain.
4.
by lordsper 11y ago
This is an advertorial for a VPN provider. Can this be removed? edit: To elaborate, I think this article ads little in terms of technical or other novelty, and is also not newsworthy. It merely describes the history of this one VPN provider
5.
by lordsper 11y ago
Weren't most of the suicides hoaxes? Like the "cut4bieber" hoax? I've never encountered one, but maybe that was "before my time".
6.
by lordsper 11y ago
What kind of breaches do you fear with your air-gapped setup?
7.
by lordsper 11y ago
Adblockers take care of that. I run NoScript for security and not because it makes pages look prettier - believe me, it doesn't. I see hiding the content of the site for lack of JS simply as lazy web development, which only considers t
8.
by lordsper 11y ago
Not under the same name, but they might just survive if they go for a (more subtle) rebrand.
9.
by lordsper 11y ago
Except there's already a verified dump out there: 40AE8A90DE40CA3AFA763C8EDB43FC1FC47D75F1 Sorry to burst your bubble, but it just won't work.
10.
by lordsper 11y ago
Or you don't do 'security' features client-side, and instead only send the hint data in response to the user's request for the hint. Wouldn't that be the 'right' way of doing this?