lookupthere

6 ms·

1.
by lookupthere 6y ago
Definitely. Most of Sub-Saharan Africa as well doesn't have an issue with breastfeeding at all. The strange thing for me in the US is that the left doesn't seem bothered by it. They are usually all up to point out arbitrary social
2.
by lookupthere 6y ago
How is violence in pursuit of freedom okay when it is done by the anti-colonial founders but not by abolitionists? In my opinion, everyone from Nat Turner to John Brown was a hero. People need to realize slavery was like the Holocaust scale
3.
by lookupthere 6y ago
It's the fundamental economics of platforms. At the same time that they are very democratic, they are also very monopolistic. It's weird and not something you should analyse without undoing your intuition about companies. The econ
4.
by lookupthere 6y ago
Inoreader is wonderful.
5.
by lookupthere 6y ago
This is entirely true. It's also the reason that more and more extreme ideas flourish. The disingenuous engagement disillusions more reasonable people. People left of center see how Barack Obama was treated for the mildest of progressi
6.
by lookupthere 6y ago
I think the point is that you are defining systemic racism wrongly if it excludes the drug war. I always thought systemic racism means the policies that lead up to this. I never interpreted it to mean that if we look at the data for a parti
7.
by lookupthere 6y ago
The author acknowledges every culture has its own upper strata There are selection mechanisms which can amplify or inhibit the effect of this upper strata - compare Cubans and Mexicans. For black Americans, that selection mechanism is racis