lolakutty

7 ms·

1.
by lolakutty 4d ago
When the creator has spent a day to create it, chances are that they are going to abandon it just as fast. Why spend time to learn something like that?
2.
by lolakutty 4d ago
normie: Loves to walk on technologically advanced crutches when they have perfectly working legs...
3.
by lolakutty 6d ago
Sorry. I don't agree that it "create" views autonomously. A human has to create a view in a database. In the case of LLM, a human has to create a "prompt" that the LLM just continue, based on the patterns humans ha
4.
by lolakutty 6d ago
At least the tools they used to use used to be so...Now the tools do this https://blog.coredump.cx/p/recursion-into-madness
5.
by lolakutty 6d ago
> LLM generated This is a proxy for "the author didn't give a shit"..Not always, but often.
6.
by lolakutty 6d ago
Internet and 24x7 connectivity is like humanity collectively having a seizure.
7.
by lolakutty 6d ago
Yes, it is a very efficient search tool for existing data..
8.
by lolakutty 7d ago
I never left, because I knew for a fact that this, what you describe, would be the ultimate eventuality.
9.
by lolakutty 7d ago
Of course, this is what the end of Men in Black shows. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKnpPCQyUec But let me tell you another possibility. What if there is no nature, but just our perception of it. Yea, tree falling in the
10.
by lolakutty 7d ago
I would think in any domain that used to suffer due to lack of a fuzzy, search. In cases where LLMs are used to generate stuff, when push comes to shove, LLMs fails to deliver. This is fundamental. For example, if you talk to an LLM regardi
11.
by lolakutty 7d ago
Yea, it is a better search tool than humans, as computers always were....
12.
by lolakutty 7d ago
Everyone who's ideas made bulldozer possible, I would say..
13.
by lolakutty 7d ago
>creative or original thought. If this can only answer questions, then it fails this test. Because at least the question has to come from somewhere...
14.
by lolakutty 7d ago
>entirety of current human achivement.. The right way to look at it is that LLMs help us to maximize the utility of the entirety of current human achievement/knowledge by discovering obscure connections in it.
15.
by lolakutty 7d ago
>Meat brains have a magical ability to manifest original ideas.. No, no. Any random sentence generator can generate original idea. Actually it is said that randomness contain all the answers. You don't need a "meat brain"
16.
by lolakutty 7d ago
Are people paid to write this shite?
17.
by lolakutty 7d ago
>More people showed up just to argue, rather than to have curious conversations. What is the difference? Just curious...
18.
by lolakutty 7d ago
Yea, it is easier to use an LLM for search than using a conventional search engine. No one is going back to that if a non-malicious LLM is available at reasonable costs.
19.
by lolakutty 7d ago
>I can close an eye on using LLMs for research only. Yes, this is the only way I use them. As a better search tool for the collective knowledge, and to do arbitrary queries on a complicated code base. If there are any mechanical changes,
20.
by lolakutty 7d ago
>Then it already knows how that made the proof work.. I think you cannot assume so, because pattern matching is not reasoning.
21.
by lolakutty 7d ago
Yea, strongly agree. I think this is going to back-fire spectacularly. They better start preparing an apology...
22.
by lolakutty 7d ago
Who should get credit? All the humans who ever worked to create the data. And the AI company for making the search program that searched through the data and found the solution.
23.
by lolakutty 8d ago
It seems that humanity would have went on a lot longer if we never left the caves, so you might have a point there.