loggerhead

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by loggerhead 2y ago

   Sorry, my previous response misunderstood your meaning. JSON For You does draw inspiration from JSON Crack for its landing page, thank you for designing such a minimalist homepage and I will put JSON CRACK to my acknowledgment. In terms of
2. 2.▲
   by loggerhead 2y ago

   Good idea. I've received a lot of feedback from the community with people hoping for some AI integration features. I am seriously considering this. Also, in terms of product positioning, if I do offer cloud storage, I don't intend
3. 3.▲
   by loggerhead 2y ago

   Belittling competitors is not a good competitive strategy, the community is smart and won't be fooled by it ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32626873 ). If you want to promote something under my post, that's f
4. 4.▲
   by loggerhead 2y ago

   Thanks, I will change it, it's really annoying.
5. 5.▲
   by loggerhead 2y ago

   Thanks, I will change it.
6. 6.▲
   by loggerhead 2y ago

   I have researched react-virtual, react-window, and canvas, and after long consideration, I ended up with the current solution. I might reconsider trying canvas again. Anyway, thanks.
7. 7.▲
   by loggerhead 2y ago

   A great tool that fills the gap of lacking a preview feature in the terminal with jq. However, for data processing, I think jq's DSL is more concise and user-friendly.
8. 8.▲
   by loggerhead 2y ago

   Thank you for your patient explanation! A very valuable perspective —- people are not willing to continuously pay for something static that doesn't get updated. Actually, I have plans to develop some features that require a server, but
9. 9.▲
   by loggerhead 2y ago

   Thanks. The main issue is that we can't reuse existing components, so the development workload will be quite large, but I'll think about it.
10. 10.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    I strongly agree with your view. I used to be a loyal user of Sublime Text, it performed exceptionally well and was incredibly fast, which I loved. However, perhaps I misspoke, what I meant to say is that due to the low development costs an
11. 11.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    Thank you for your support! I'm open to all kinds of feedback and want to understand different perspectives. After gathering enough input, I'll digest and understand it before making any decisions, ensuring not to take any single
12. 12.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    nice work!
13. 13.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    The issue isn't with the editor itself, but rather because rendering becomes very time-consuming when there are too many DOM nodes. This is due to the specification limiting to only one main UI thread.
14. 14.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    Interesting perspective. Let me share my thoughts, which might relate to consumer psychology: - With a buyout system, users perceive that they own the item after payment. - With a subscription system, users perceive that they are renting th
15. 15.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    Thank you for your support! I have indeed put a lot of thought into it, and it's something I use often myself. The crashing with large data volumes is a known issue that many have feedbacked on. I have plans to optimize it, but I'
16. 16.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts! Based on feedback from multiple people, it's clear there's a significant issue with the product pricing, which I'll seriously reflect upon! From your perspective, there seem to b
17. 17.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    Oh, my bad. I'll change it.
18. 18.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    Haha, that's a sharp critique, and I've also felt that the development of the web isn't fast enough. But actually, when you think about the web from ten years ago, or even twenty years ago, there has been significant progress
19. 19.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    I understand your point, but I believe that a one-time payment is not conducive to its ongoing development. Think about it, if you charge all the money at once, where does the motivation to continue updating come from after a year or two? B
20. 20.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    Indeed, JSON For You is significantly behind visidata in handling table data compared to it. Their focuses are different, perhaps I can learn some highlights from its design. However, if you have needs for JSON processing, you might want to
21. 21.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    I think the main reason is the rapid development of web technologies, which has significantly reduced the cost of developing software with a GUI. And web technologies are best suited for the web itself, whereas running locally would introdu
22. 22.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    You mean offering it for free to everyone, but driving traffic to social media? Also, can I ask, from a consumer's perspective, what pricing do you think would be acceptable for my product?
23. 23.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    Thank you all for your suggestions and feedback, really helpful to me. I am offering a coupon for the first year free (limited to 10 uses) as a thank you: UZNZQ5NW
24. 24.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    I'm wondering, if I offer an embedding feature, would people still be as eager for a react component? For example, something similar to CodeSandbox's embedding capability.
25. 25.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    Yes, it requires regular payment, from the SaaS perspective, since the cost is a monthly expense, adopting a subscription model is understandable. This pricing was inspired by https://jsoncrack.com/ . May I ask, is there any
26. 26.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    Thank you very much for your feedback! It's very insightful. Are you saying that for local tools, people are more willing to purchase through a one-time buyout rather than a subscription model? Because they feel that a subscription doe
27. 27.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    I've done my best to optimize it, although there's still room for improvement, but it's quite challenging (but I'll give it a try). The reason is that we're constrained by the browser's UI thread being single-t
28. 28.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    You can try my website, I guarantee you'll be satisfied, haha.
29. 29.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    Yes, I've thought about it, but I haven't come up with a good implementation approach. Do you have any good ideas? Here's the problem I'm facing: I want the table view to support not just regular array but also complex o
30. 30.▲
    by loggerhead 2y ago

    I didn't know about it when I was making mine, otherwise, I would have definitely borrowed some ideas from it, haha. I have considered view-based editing functions, and I'm wondering if it's really necessary (if so, it will b