load

5 ms·

1.
by load 5y ago
I think everyone saw this one coming... ...although the article is a tad misleading. if a user reports a message, the message (and a bit of chat history) is sent to facebook mods, as it probably should be.
2.
Super weird questions for this normal “collaborator assessment test”?(checkitout.https)
1 points by load 6y ago|0 comments
3.
China requires gamers to reveal real names and map them to IDs(theregister.com)
11 points by load 6y ago|1 comments
4.
by load 6y ago
Probably not - if something gets as popular as these it isn't likely they're going to be forgotten anytime soon, least of all the Hunger Games. Many of them will probably grow into 'classics' in the decades following, an
5.
Pakistan bans one Chinese app, gives TikTok a final warning to clean up its act(theregister.com)
2 points by load 6y ago|1 comments
6.
Linux Foundation starts new group to build pandemic-popping software(theregister.com)
2 points by load 6y ago|0 comments
7.
by load 6y ago
It seems like Koch wants to keep pushing consensus to privatize the postal service by weakening funding for it, which is, either intentionally or unintentionally, economically harming it. I'm on the fence over whether 'kill'
8.
by load 6y ago
This is awesome. I ended up just removing random bits to make it look wrong, but somehow it always ended up looking pretty stunning. I think the shadows also add a lot to the scene. I also made a pretty good-looking two layered structure wi
9.
by load 6y ago
The inversion principle is a great mental model in my opinion. The best way I can sum it up in the most basic way is instead of thinking "What can I do to [achieve goal]?", think "What is preventing me from [achieving goal]?&
10.
by load 6y ago
By 'MediaWiki' I'm referring to the wikis and wiki farms that use MediaWiki or a variant of it. This includes: - Wikimedia - FANDOM - Gamepedia - Miraheze FANDOM is the most massive wiki farm with over 360,000+ (as of 2016) w
11.
by load 6y ago
Hmm. I'll go check it out. The main thing I'm worried about with other wiki software (including Wiki.js) is that if it's compatible with gadgets, userscripts and all of the other neat tools already available. It doesn't
12.
by load 6y ago
From what I've discovered it does seem to be a rather simple and easy-to-use platform, if a bit too basic. I myself wouldn't use it, but it seems like a much-welcome platform for those without too much experience on the technical
13.
by load 6y ago
I mean, I appreciate the effort put into building this, but external tools like AWB, and userscripts/gadgets (plus a host of other goodies) can't be accessed over globally if it's on a completely different software. Almost ev
14.
by load 6y ago
If it doesn't run on MediaWiki, I'm not into it.